AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Vertika Singh @ Vartika Singh v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Bapu Bhawan Lko. And Another

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

    APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 784 of 2025

    Court No. - 11

    HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

    1. Heard Ms. Vartika Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Puneet Saxena,

    learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State

    of U.P. and perused the record.

    2. The instant application has been preferred with the prayer to direct the

    learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Lucknow to conclude the trial

    of Case No.523/2014, State Versus Shailendra Singh and others under

    Sections- 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of DP Act, pending

    before him, expeditiously, in the interest of law and justice.

    3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the

    application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present

    application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all

    endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously,

    as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including

    the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India

    and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary,

    State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81 and Kadra Pahadiya and Others Vs. State

    of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is

    implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

    4. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of.

    September 18, 2025 DiVYa

    Versus

    Counsel for Applicant(s) : Puneet Saxena, Chitrangada Narayan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

    (Saurabh Lavania,J.)

    Vertika Singh @ Vartika Singh .....Applicant(s)

    State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Bapu Bhawan Lko. And Another .....Opposite

    Party(s)

      1. 2025-09-19T15:06:02+0530
      2. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Vertika Singh @ Vartika Singh v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Bapu Bhawan Lko. And Another
    (Sep 18, 2025)