Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2010 AHC 95744
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2010 AHC 95744
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Sunita Upadhyay v. State Of U.P. And Others

    Court No. - 36

    Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43306 of 2010

    Petitioner :- Sunita Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Petitioner Counsel :- Rupesh Srivastava Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,P.K. Tripathi

    Hon'ble R.K. Agrawal,J. Hon'ble Rajesh Chandra,J.

    In the present writ petition the petitioner has come up with the prayer for a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the State Bank of India, Branch C.V. Ganj Bareilly to accept the outstanding dues of the balance of loan in easy instalments. From the record it appears that the petitioner has straightway approached this Court instead of approaching the bank authorities. The writ petition is misconceived and is dismissed.

    Order Date :- 11.8.2010 mt

    Neutral Citation No. - 2010:AHC:95744-DB

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Sunita Upadhyay v. State Of U.P. And Others
    (Aug 11, 2010)