Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 13 (4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of the Financial Assets and 1 of 2 CWP-1-2025 (O&M). -2- Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002,
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 13 (4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of the Financial Assets and 1 of 2 CWP-1-2025 (O&M). -2- Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002,
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    RAVI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

    CWP-1-2025 (O&M). -1-

    IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

    CHANDIGARH.

    105

    CWP-1-2025 (O&M). Date of Decision: 02.01.2025.

    RAVI

    … Petitioner(s) Versus

    THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

    … Respondent(s) ***

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI.

    *** Present: Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

    VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

    Prayer made in the present petition is for seeking issuance of directions to respondent No.2-the District Magistrate, Faridabad, to consider the representation dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioner.

    2 On being confronted with the fact that notice under Section 13

    (4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of the Financial Assets and

    1 of 2

    CWP-1-2025 (O&M). -2-

    Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, was served upon the petitioner on 10.01.2024 and thereafter, vide order dated 23.10.2024, respondent No.2 has passed an order to take physical possession of the plot in question and that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the said Act of 2002, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition so as to take recourse to the alternative remedies available to the petitioner in accordance with law.

    3 Disposed of as withdrawn with liberties as aforesaid.

    (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)

    JUDGE

    January 02, 2025. (AMARJOT BHATTI) raj arora JUDGE

    Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

    2 of 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    RAVI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
    (Jan 2, 2025)