Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Acts
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Acts
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    MAHIPAL SINGH CHARAN v. STATE

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

    JODHPUR

    S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1464/2021 Mahipal Singh Charan S/o Bhawani Singh Charan, Aged About 48 Years, Shriji Colony, Near Ganesh Nagar, Rajsamand. ----Petitioner

    Versus

    1. State, Through P.p.

    2. Suman Choudhary W/o Satveer Singh Chaudhary, Present Address - Kishore Nagar, Gandhi Sewa Sadan, Rajnagar, District Rajsamand.

    ----Respondents

    For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hinglag Dan Charan For Respondent(s) : Mr. MS Bhati, PP

    Mr. Devendra Mehalana

    HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order

    20/12/2022

    1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the complainant submit that the petitioner and the complainant have entered into a compromise in the on-going criminal proceedings. It is thus submitted that the parties are not inclined to proceed further in the matter.

    2. Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

    3. Learned Public Prosecutor has got the factum of compromise dated 08.12.2022 verified through I.O. Factual report in this regard is taken on record.

    4. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties as

    1

    (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1464/2021] well as verification of factum thereof by learned Public Prosecutor on the strength of the aforementioned factual report and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

    5. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.119/2020 lodged at Police Station, Charbhuja, District Rajsamand for the offence under Sections 354, 354A, 354D, 509 IPC, alongwith entire proceedings pursuant thereto qua the petitioners are hereby quashed.

    6. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

    164-Sanjay/-

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    MAHIPAL SINGH CHARAN v. STATE
    (Dec 20, 2022)