Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    ATLA SUMAN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

    1

    APHC010493912024

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

    AT AMARAVATI

    (Special Original Jurisdiction)

    [3396]

    MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER

    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

    CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7901/2024

    Between:

    Atla Suman and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

    AND

    The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

    1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA

    Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

    1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

    The Court made the following Order:

    The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of BNSS, is filed on behalf of the petitioners herein/A2 to A5 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.76 of 2024 of Chittamuru Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 109, 118(1) read with 5 of BNS.

    1

    2. Heard Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State.

    3. Perused the record.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that A1 was granted anticipatory bail by the trial Court on medical grounds. Except omnibus allegations, there are no specific allegations made against the petitioners herein. No wound certificate is there to support the version of the victim that they suffered injuries. Learned counsel for the petitioners further would submit that most of the investigation might have been completed by this time and prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

    5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner and submit that investigation is not completed and it is at crucial stage to receive the wound certificate of the victim. It is a case of criminal assault on victim in the hands of the accused.

    6. In the light of the nature and gravity of the incident, it is a case that A2 to A5 attacked the victim and victim suffered injuries in the hands of the accused. Moreover, investigation is not completed and it

    2

    is at crucial stage, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

    7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

    ________________________________

    VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA,J

    Date: 02-12-2024

    ASR

    3

    THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI

    PRATAPA

    CRIMINAL PETITION No.7901 of 2024

    DATE:02.12.2024

    ASR

    4

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    ATLA SUMAN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
    (Dec 2, 2024)