AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    TEJINDER SINGH BHATIA v. M/S SUKHM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.

    ITEM NO.1719 COURT NO.13 SECTION IV-B

    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

    Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13687/2022 TEJINDER SINGH BHATIA & ANR. Petitioner(s)

    VERSUS

    M/S SUKHM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY SLP NO. 13687/2022 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE HON'BLE CHAMBER

    JUDGE )

    Date : 15-12-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

    CORAM :

    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

    [IN CHAMBER]

    For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ankit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

    Mr. Saurabh Mishra, AOR

    Ms. Preeti Kashyap, Adv.

    Mr. Varun Pandit, Adv.

    Mr. Shrimay Mishra, Adv.

    For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Bhargava Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, AOR Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR

    UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following

    O R D E R

    Mr. Ankit Sharma, learned counsel, appears for the petitioners and again seeks time to take necessary steps in relation to deceased respondent No.5. Mr. Gaurav Bhargava, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No.2, however opposes his request, pointing

    1

    out that time was granted twice to do the needful in this regard but no steps have been taken till date. Record reflects that a last opportunity was given to the petitioners to take steps in relation to unserved respondent No.3 as well as deceased respondent No.5, which was followed by an adjournment again on 15.09.2023.

    It appears that the petitioners are also enjoying the benefit of the ex parte interim order granted on

    09.01.2023.

    As sufficient time and opportunity have already been given to the petitioners to take appropriate measures, the matter is adjourned by four weeks by way of a final concession. In the event the petitioners fail to take necessary steps in relation to deceased respondent No.5 by filing proper applications within the time stipulated, the special leave petition shall stand dismissed as against respondent No.5 without further reference to the Court and the petitioners shall be solely responsible for the consequences and fallout thereof.

    (RASHMI DHYANI PANT) (VEENA RANI NAGPAL)

    COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    TEJINDER SINGH BHATIA v. M/S SUKHM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
    (Dec 15, 2023)