AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    DAL SINGH AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

    1

    M.Cr.C.No.6376/2012

    12.09.2012

    Shri Vivek Singh, learned Counsel for the applicants.

    Shri Amit Singh Sisodiya, learned Panel Lawyer for

    the respondent/State.

    After arguing the matter for sometime, Counsel for

    the applicants submits that he does not wish to press this

    application. He, however, craves liberty of this Court to file fresh

    application after material witness Ramesh has been examined.

    Prayer being reasonable is accepted.

    Counsel for the respondent/State has not opposed the

    prayer.

    Therefore, the application is dismissed as not pressed

    and liberty as prayed is granted to the applicants.

    Cc. as per rules.

    (MRS. S.R. WAGHMARE) JUDGE

    Jyoti

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    DAL SINGH AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
    (Sep 12, 2012)