AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    CAROLINE CHAKRAVARTHY KANDRAGULA v. OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF

    - 1 -

    NC: 2023:KHC:40183

    CA No. 258 of 2023 IN COP No.214 of 2012

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

    BEFORE

    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

    COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 258 OF 2023

    IN

    COMPANY PETITION NO.214 OF 2012

    BETWEEN:

    1. CAROLINE CHAKRAVARTHY KANDRAGULA

    WIFE OF SANDEEP CHKRAVARTHY KANDRAGULA

    AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

    R/O PLOT NO.50, GANESH NAGAR

    WEST MARREDPALLY

    SECUNDEABAD 500026

    TELANGANA

    …APPLICANT

    (BY SRI PRITHVI RAJ B N, ADVOCATE)

    AND:

    1. OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF

    M/S KINGFISHER AIRLINES LIMITED

    (IN LIQUIDATION)

    ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

    CORPORATE BHAVAN

    NOS 26-27, 12TH FLOOR

    RAHEJA TOWERS

    M G ROAD, BENGALURU 560001

    …RESPONDENT

    (BY SRI JAGADEESHGOUD PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR OL)

    THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 177

    OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959 R/W SECTION 5 OF THE

    LIMITATION ACT PRAYING TO CONDONE THE DELAY 935 DAYS IN

    PREFERRING HER CLAIM OF HER DUES FROM THE RESPONDENT IN

    THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

    THIS APPLICATION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE

    COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

    - 2 -

    ORDER

    The present application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 935 days in preferring of her claim of the dues from the respondent.

    2. It is forthcoming that the applicant had preferred a claim of `10,30,320./- being a statutory and legal dues from the Respondent. The Applicant has preferred the claim on 06.09.2019 and hence, there was a delay. In view of the fact that the applicant who is a resident of Telangana had learnt of the requirement of filing of the claim belatedly and publication made was circulated in the State of Karnataka the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause. It is further placed on record that due to Covid-19 pandemic, the applicant was unable to pursue the matter.

    3. From a perusal of the reasons set out in the application, it is forthcoming the same are genuine and bonafide.

    4. Learned counsel for Respondent has not seriously objected to the said application.

    - 3 -

    4. In view of the same, the relief sought for in the application is liable to be granted. C.A. No. 258/2023 is allowed. Delay of 935 days in preferring the claim by the applicant is condoned.

    SD/-

    JUDGE

    BS

    List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    CAROLINE CHAKRAVARTHY KANDRAGULA v. OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF
    (Nov 8, 2023)