Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • FINANCE ACT 2015
  • provisions of SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulations framed thereunder. Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992
  • Regulation 3(1) of IA Regulations read with Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act.
  • provisions of Section 12(1) of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as SEBI Act, 1992) and Regulation 3(1) of SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as IA Regulations, 2013).
  • Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B(1) read with of Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992
  • India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act), Sections 12(1) of SEBI Act and Regulations 3(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013,(IA Regulations).
  • Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.
  • Section 2(h) of Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • FINANCE ACT 2015
  • provisions of SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulations framed thereunder. Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992
  • Regulation 3(1) of IA Regulations read with Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act.
  • provisions of Section 12(1) of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as SEBI Act, 1992) and Regulation 3(1) of SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as IA Regulations, 2013).
  • Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B(1) read with of Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992
  • India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act), Sections 12(1) of SEBI Act and Regulations 3(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013,(IA Regulations).
  • Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.
  • Section 2(h) of Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred
Smart Summary

Structured Summary of the Provided SEBI Opinion (M/s GVM Research & partners)

Factual and Procedural Background

SEBI issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 8 October 2021 to M/s GVM Research and named partners (Noticees) after prima facie findings that they were engaged in investment advisory services without SEBI registration, allegedly in breach of Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 3(1) of the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (IA Regulations). The SCN relied on multiple complaints alleging that advisory services by M/s GVM Research caused investor losses and that fees were collected for such services.

Noticees 1, 3 and 4 filed a reply dated 11 November 2021 and sought hearing opportunities; Noticee no. 2 did not file a reply. Personal hearing opportunities were scheduled and concluded on 28 April 2022 where authorised representatives for Noticees 1, 3 and 4 made submissions; Noticee no. 2 did not appear. SEBI examined archived webpages of www.gvmresearch.com, bank records (Axis Bank account no. 915020057758054), PayU transaction records, KYC and account opening forms, and other documents in reaching its findings and directions.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the Noticees were acting as "investment advisers" by providing advice (including on commodity derivatives) for consideration without obtaining the mandatory certificate of registration under Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 3(1) of IA Regulations, 2013.
  2. Whether SEBI should exercise its powers under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B(1) read with Section 19 of the SEBI Act to direct remedies including refund of fees/consideration, imposition of debarment/restrictions, and deposit of balance amounts with SEBI in an escrow for distribution to clients/investors.

Arguments of the Parties

Responding Noticees (M/s GVM Research and partners) — principal submissions

  • The responding noticees asserted they were not currently engaged in investment advisory business, either jointly or severally.
  • M/s GVM Research is a partnership firm; the firm and named partners claimed their activity was limited to recommendations in commodity derivatives only (commodity market advisory), not other securities.
  • They contended they were unaware that amendments (Finance Act, 2015) expanding definitions to include commodity derivatives required SEBI registration; upon becoming aware they ceased operations in February 2017.
  • They stated total receipts in the Axis Bank account (30 Nov 2015 to 4 Feb 2017) were Rs. 3,46,304.50 and claimed Rs. 1,50,000 of that amount was not received for advisory business (breakdown: Rs.10,000 account opening funds by partners; Rs.30,000 partner deposit; Rs.1,10,000 wrong credit reversed).
  • The noticees contended they had no mala fide intention to harm the securities market or its participants.
  • Noticee no. 2 did not file a reply and did not appear for the hearing.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
Order in the matter of Shri C. Paranitharan (SEBI order dated 05 July 2022) SEBI directed refund of fees/consideration received from investors in respect of unregistered investment advisory activities. The Court referred to this order as an instance where SEBI directed refunds for unregistered advisory activity and used it as a comparable enforcement measure when framing directions in the present case.
Order in the matter of TrendMarket Advisory Services (SEBI order dated 07 July 2022 and SAT common order dated 21 September 2022) SAT directed appellants to deposit the balance amount after making refunds; deposit to be kept in an escrow for one year and distributed to claimants, with remaining amount to be deposited in Investor Protection and Education Fund. The Court relied on the SAT direction to structure remedial measures here: ordering deposit of remaining balance with SEBI to be held in escrow for distribution and eventual transfer to the Investor Protection and Education Fund if unclaimed.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court proceeded in a stepwise legal analysis anchored in the IA Regulations and SCRA definitions as amended in 2015:

  1. Statutory definitions and amendments:
    • Regulation 2(1)(l) of IA Regulations defines "investment advice" to include advice relating to investing in, purchasing, selling or otherwise dealing in securities or investment products, and advice on investment portfolios containing such securities or products.
    • Section 2(h) of the Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1957 (SCRA) includes derivatives within "securities"; following the Finance Act, 2015 amendment (effective 28.09.2015), "commodity derivatives" were brought within the definition of derivatives (Section 2(ac) of SCRA). Consequently, advice on commodity derivatives falls within the IA Regulations' definition of investment advice.
  2. Factual findings from evidence:
    • Archived website content of www.gvmresearch.com showed the firm advertised investment-advisory-style services, multiple subscription packages, claims of guaranteed or high accuracy tips, profit claims, and fee schedules.
    • The website's payment tab listed an Axis Bank account in the name of M/s GVM Research and PayU Money as a payment method; SEBI obtained bank statements, KYC and account opening forms corroborating that the Axis Bank account (no. 915020057758054) belonged to M/s GVM Research, with the nature of business listed as "Equity & Commodity Advisory Firm" and partnership deed describing commodity market advisory.
    • Bank records reflected multiple credit entries from several individuals into the Axis Bank account; PayU records showed payments to Noticee no. 3's Bank of India account (Rs. 10,268.27). Total credits to the Axis account in the specified period amounted to Rs. 3,46,304.50.
  3. Application of law to facts:
    • Given the statutory definitions and the evidence of promotional material, fee schedules, and receipt of funds through the firm's bank account and PayU, the court concluded the Noticees were offering investment advisory services for consideration.
    • Because such activities required prior registration under Regulation 3(1) of IA Regulations and Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, the Noticees' conduct amounted to acting as investment advisers without obtaining the mandatory certificate of registration.
    • The replying noticees' explanations (unawareness of the 2015 amendment; cessation of operations in February 2017; a claimed portion of receipts unrelated to advisory services) did not negate the evidence that advisory services were offered and fees were collected. The court accepted the Rs.10,000 partner deposit shown in bank records but observed that the noticees did not satisfactorily substantiate the remaining claimed Rs.1,40,000 as non-advisory receipts; they were given liberty to produce evidence to a Chartered Accountant for certification of refunds.
  4. Regulatory policy and safeguards:
    • The court noted the purpose of IA Regulations — protecting investors and ensuring integrity of securities market — and listed statutory safeguards (qualification, experience, net-worth and compliance requirements) that make registration necessary before carrying out advisory activities.
  5. Resulting conclusion:
    • On the basis of the statutory framework, website disclosures, payment records and bank documents, the court found violations of Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of IA Regulations, 2013 and proceeded to exercise remedial powers under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B(1) read with Section 19 of the SEBI Act to issue directions.

Holding and Implications

Core Ruling: The Court directed remedial measures against M/s GVM Research and its partners for acting as unregistered investment advisers, including refunds to clients, publication of refund modalities, restricted dealings in assets and a temporary debarment from the securities market.

Direct Consequences and Directions (as ordered)

  • Refund obligation: The Noticees (M/s GVM Research and partners Nilesh Joshi, Yashwant Sharma and Ramesh Joshi) must, within three (3) months from the date of the Order, refund money received from investors/clients as fees/consideration in respect of unregistered investment advisory activities (para 21(a)).
  • Public notice and claim period: Within 15 days, Noticees must issue public notices in two national dailies (one English, one Hindi) and one widely circulated local daily detailing refund modalities and contact details; investors will have two months from publication to submit claims (para 21(b)).
  • Mode of repayment: Repayments must be effected through bank demand draft, pay order, electronic fund transfer or other banking channels ensuring audit trails (para 21(c)).
  • Certification and reporting: Within 15 days after completing refunds, the Noticees must file a CA-certified report with SEBI showing refunded amounts, modes of payment, beneficiary details, etc., addressed to the specified SEBI division (para 21(d)).
  • Deposit of remaining balance with SEBI: Any balance amount shall be deposited with SEBI to be held in an escrow account for one year for distribution to claimants; any remaining amount thereafter to be deposited in the Investor Protection and Education Fund (para 21(e)).
  • Restraints on assets and banking operations: Noticees are restrained from selling assets or holdings except to effect refunds or deposit balances with SEBI; banks are permitted to debit accounts only for refunds and deposit with SEBI (para 21(f)).
  • Debarment from securities market: Noticees are debarred from accessing the securities market and prohibited from buying, selling or dealing in securities (directly or indirectly) for five (5) months from the date of the Order or until five months after completion of refunds and deposit of balance with SEBI, whichever is later (para 21(g)).
  • Post-completion effect: The restraint on sale of assets will cease to operate 15 days after submission of the CA-certified refund completion report and deposit of the balance amount, if any, with SEBI (para 21(h)).
  • Prohibition on providing advisory services: Noticees shall not undertake investment advisory services or any securities market activity without obtaining SEBI registration, during or after expiry of the debarment period (para 21(i)).
  • Preservation of other remedies: The SEBI directions do not preclude investors/clients from pursuing other legal remedies under any law against the Noticees for refund or deficiency in service before competent fora (para 22).
  • Immediate effect and service: The directions are effective immediately and a copy of the Order shall be served on the Noticees, recognised stock exchanges, depositories, banks and registrars/transfer agents for compliance (paras 23–24).

Implications Regarding Precedent and Broader Impact

The Order follows and applies remedial measures resembling prior SEBI and SAT directions (as cited) concerning refunds and escrow deposits for unregistered investment advisory activities. The opinion does not state that it establishes a novel legal precedent; rather it applies existing regulatory provisions and past enforcement practice to the facts of the case.

Note: This summary is strictly based on the contents of the provided opinion and does not add or infer facts beyond those expressly contained therein.

    In Respect Of Gvm Research And Others

    Ananta Barua, Whole Time Member:— The present proceedings emanate from a show cause notice dated October 08, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as “SCN”) issued by Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI”) against the Noticees wherein it was prima facie found that the Noticees were engaged in investment advisory services without obtaining a certificate of registration from SEBI in violation of the provisions of Section 12(1) of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI Act, 1992”) and Regulation 3(1) of SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “IA Regulations, 2013”). The SCN called upon the Noticees to show cause as to why suitable directions including refund of fees collected, debarment, non-association with listed entities, intermediaries, etc. should not be issued against the Noticees under Sections 11(4) and 11B(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992.

    2. The SCN alleged that SEBI received two complaints against M/s GVM Research stating that the complainants incurred losses due to advisory services provided by the Noticees. One of the complainants submitted that M/s GVM Research charged an amount of Rs. 75000/- for providing advisory services which resulted in a loss of Rs. 2 lakhs to the complainant. Subsequently, M/s GVM Research demanded Rs. 25000/- from the said complainant and assured to provide daily profit of Rs. 25,000/- Another complainant submitted that GVM Research charged Rs. 2 lakhs for advisory services and even though he lost all his money due to the advisory service, M/s GVM Research kept asking for more money. The complainant also submitted that there are three persons involved in the operations of M/s GVM Research and they claim to be registered with SEBI. However, when the complainant verified their status on SEBI's website, they found that M/s GVM Research is not registered with SEBI. Subsequently, SEBI also came across another complaint against Noticees at Consumer Complaints Forum (www.consumercomplaints.in). In the said complaint, the complainant had alleged that the Noticee is a fraud and that the Noticee provides fraudulent calls which don't get executed. As per the intermediary database on SEBI website, M/s GVM Research was not registered with SEBI as an investment advisor.

    3. The SCN was served upon the Noticees through Registered Post. Noticee no. 1, 3 and 4 (hereinafter referred to as the “replying noticees”) filed their reply dated November 11, 2021 through authorized representative. Noticee no. 2 did not file any reply to the SCN. Noticee no. 1, 3 and 4 in their reply dated November 11, 2021 requested to grant an opportunity of hearing. Thereafter, the matter was placed before me for granting personal hearing on December 27, 2021. An opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the Noticees on February 28, 2022. Noticee no. 1, 3 and 4 sought adjournment of hearing scheduled on February 28, 2022. Noticee no. 2 neither sought an adjournment nor appeared for the hearing scheduled for February 28, 2022. Accordingly, another opportunity of hearing was granted to all the Noticees on April 28, 2022. On the scheduled date of hearing, the Authorized Representative of the Noticee nos. 1, 3 and 4 appeared in person and made submissions in the case, through CISCO WebEx platform. None appeared on behalf of Noticee no. 2 and no request/intimation seeking adjournment was received from Noticee no. 2. Accordingly, hearing qua the Noticees was concluded on April 28, 2022.

    4. The Noticee vide his reply dated November 11, 2021, has submitted inter alia the following:

    “With respect to above subject and reference we would like to state that Noticee No. 1 and 2 : M/s. GVM Research (hereinafter referred as “Respondent no. 1”), Notice No. 3 and 4 : Mr. Yashwant Sharma (hereinafter referred as “Respondent no. 2”) and Noticee No. 5 : Mr. Ramesh Joshi (hereinafter referred as “Respondent no. 3”), are in receipt of a Show Cause Notice under sections 11(1),11(4) and 11B(1) of The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (“SEBI Act”), Sections 12(1) of SEBI Act and Regulations 3(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013,(“IA Regulations”).

    In the aforementioned SCN, the Respondent No. 1, 2 and 3 are alleged to have violated Regulation 3(1) of IA Regulations read with Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act.

    The aforementioned SCN mentions three unique complaints against Respondent No. 1 alleging providing advisory services and causing losses.

    At the outset the Respondent No. 1, 2 and 3 would like to clarify that they are currently not engaged in any capacity jointly or severally in the business of Investment Advisory, as defined and regulated under IA Regulations.

    The Respondent No. 1 is a partnership firm in which Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 along with Noticee No. 3 are partners. The Respondent No. 1 was engaged in business of giving, recommendations in the commodities derivatives only and in no other securities.

    The Respondent No. 1 and its partners were unaware of the amendments in the SEBI Act and its applicability as a result of amendments Inserted by Part II of Chapter VIII of the Finance Act 2015, w.e.f. 28.09.2015 vide Gazette Notification F. No. 1/9/SM/2015, Extraordinary, Pt. II, Sec. 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 28.08.2015.

    It is pertinent to note that the Respondent No. 1 and its partner when became aware of the fact that their business require SEBI Registration under 3(1) of IA Regulations, they immediately ceased operations in February 2017.

    The Respondent No. 1 has received a total of Rs. 3,46,304.50 in its current account during the period 30 Nov. 2015 to 4 Feb. 2017 in its Axis Bank Account No. 915020057758054. Out of the total amount as mentioned above following transactions were not received for advisory business:

    Sr. No. Date Amount Description 1 30.11.2015 10000/- Account Opening Fund by Partners 2 14.12.2015 30000/- Cash Deposited by Partner 3 24.06.2016 110000/- Wrong credit in Account, reversed immediately Total 1,50,000/-

    The Respondent No. 1, 2 and 3 had no mala fide intention to cause harm to the securities market and participants thereof.”

    5. The SCN alleged that the Noticees were carrying out unregistered investment advisory activities through the website www.gvmresearch.com. I note that the website was not active, but from the archive of the webpages, as available on ‘web.archive.org’, I note that the following was disclosed on the website:

    “… Gvm research-Investment Adviser has proven itself as company that produces high accuracy tips and recommendations for-Commodity-MCX NCDEX and COMEX

    As an extension to the retail services, GVM invites people from all over India to become Gvm research and make a living by connecting potential customers with Gvm. To lean about the program and how it is different from a Franchise model please visit-www.gvmrsearch.com

    In addition to the retail services above, Gvm also caters to institutional clients like brokers, mutual funds and banks and fulfills their customer research needs. To learn more about the institutional business of Gvmresearch please visit-www.gvmrsearch.com is Canada's premier newsletter delivering intelligence on research and development, science and technology, innovation and knowledge-based economic development. Established in 1987, we have a proven track record for providing subscribers with original timely analysis of the polices, programs and collaborations that are aimed at transforming Canada into a leading player in the knowledge-based global economy………

    GVMRESEARCH offers its readers comprehensive insight into the trends initiatives and major players shaping the science and technology landscape. Win trading Software is technical analysis strategy which gives an accurate for buy or sell signal shows with stop loss & targets to a proper risk ratio for avoiding heavy loss in markets day trading. We are develop one of the most accurate for amibroker in the field of commodity market for trading analyzing. We are providing tips in MCX Segment like Gold, Silver, Copper, Nickel, Crude oil, Natural gas to our clients.”

    6. From the copy of archived webpages as available on record, I note that various packages (Monthly/Quarterly/Half-yearly/Yearly) were being offered for subscription at specified rates and for specific products. Some of the products offered through the said website are as follows:

    Sr. No. Name of Service 1. Crude Oil 99.99% Accurate Package 2. Gold 99.99% Accurate Package 3. Silver 99.99% Accurate Package 4. Natural Gas 99.99% Accurate Package 5. Base Metal 99.99% Accurate Package 6. Inventory Special 99.99% Accurate Package 7. MCX HNI 99.99% Accurate Package 8. Platinum 99.99% Accurate Package 9. Super Platinum 99.99% Accurate Package

    7. The following was also disclosed on the website:

    a. Your investment is 100% secure with us, guaranteed.

    b. Daily Rs. 5,000-Rs. 45,000/- profit with quality service.

    c. Daily 1 call and 100% accurate only 1 package.

    d. The fees ranged from Rs. 8,000 per month to Rs. 5,77,000/- quarterly.

    8. Further, as per the payment tab of archive webpages of the website www.gvmresearch.com, I note that in order to make payments for availing the services of the Noticee, the following bank account details were provided at the website:

    Account Name M/s. GVM Research Bank Name Axis Bank Ltd. Account No. 915020057758054 NEFT/IFSC Code UTIB0000568

    9. The payment tab of the website also provides the PayU Money mode of payment.

    10. During the examination, SEBI procured bank statements, KYC documents and Account Opening Forms of A/c no. 915020057758054 from Axis Bank Ltd. From the analysis of these documents, SEBI found that M/s GVM Research is a partnership firm and Noticee nos. 2, 3 and 4 are its partners. The nature of business mentioned in Account Opening Form is Equity & Commodity Advisory Firm. The partnership deed, attached with Account Opening Form, reiterate the nature of business activity by the Noticee as Commodity Market Advisory. The Axis Bank account no. 915020057758054 was opened on November 30, 2015 and the total amount credited in the said bank account from November 30, 2015 to February 4, 2017 is Rs. 3,46,304.50/-. It was also found that multiple credit transactions were done through the PayU Money payment gateway. PayU Money vide email dated February 07, 2020, provided statement of transactions to SEBI. From the analysis of these documents, it was observed that the PayU Money payment gateway was linked to the Bank of India A/c no. 880710110005306 of Noticee no. 3 i.e. Mr. Yashwant Sharma. It was further observed that from November 18, 2015 to February 29, 2016, Noticee no. 3 has received total amount of Rs. 10,268.27/- through PayU Money Gateway in its Bank of India A/c no. 880710110005306. The statement of transactions received from Bank, PayU Money and KYC documents received from Bank of India and PayU Money were enclosed as Annexures to the SCN.

    11. The replying Noticees submitted that M/s GVM Research was engaged in business of giving, recommendations in the commodity derivatives only and in no other securities. The Noticees further submitted that M/s GVM Research and its partners were unaware of the amendments in the SEBI Act, 1992 and its applicability to its business of giving investment advice in commodity derivatives as a result of amendments inserted by Finance Act, 2015.

    12. In this regard, I note that Regulation 2(l) of IA Regulations, 2013 provides that “investment advice” means advice relating to investing in, purchasing, selling or otherwise dealing in securities or investment products, and advice on investment portfolio containing securities or investment products. As per Section 2(h) of Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as “SCRA”) “securities” inter alia includes derivatives. Moreover, a “commodity derivative” was included under the definition of derivatives as provided under Section 2(ac) of SCRA through an amendment inserted by Part II of Chapter VIII of the Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f 28.09.2015 vide Gazette Notification F. No. 1/9/SM/2015, Extraordinary, Pt. II, Sec. 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 28.08.2015. Thus, as a result of the aforesaid amendment, commodity derivatives got covered under the definition of “securities” under Section 2(h) of SCRA and consequently advice relating to investing in commodity derivatives is covered under the definition of investment advice given under Regulation 2(1)(l) of IA Regulations, 2013.

    13. I note from the contents of the website ‘www.gvmresearch.com’, it is abundantly clear that M/s GVM Research was engaged in offering investment advisory services. Further, from the bank statements, KYC and Account Opening Forms of the bank account mentioned under the ‘Payments’ tab of the website, it is evident that the Axis Bank account no. 915020057758054 belonged to M/s GVM Research and the payment through the PayU Money payment gateway available on the website was received by Noticee no. 3, Mr. Yashwant Sharma, one of the partners of M/s GVM Research. Further, from the various credit entries in the aforesaid bank account of M/s GVM Research, it is observed that there are large number of credit entries from several individuals. In view of the above, I find that the Noticees were engaged in offering investment advisory services to clients/investors for a consideration, without obtaining registration from SEBI. I also note that Noticees have not submitted that credit entries in the bank account of M/s GVM Research were not pertaining to funds received by the Noticees from clients/investors while offering unregistered investment advisory services. Instead the replying noticees have submitted that they were not aware that their business requires SEBI Registration under Regulation 3(1) of IA Regulations, 2013 and after becoming aware they ceased operations in February, 2017. The replying noticees have also submitted that M/s GVM Research received a total of Rs. 3,46,304.50/- in its Axis Bank current account no. 915020057758054 during the period November 30, 2015 to February 04, 2017. Out of the total amount received a total of Rs. 1,50,000/- was not received for advisory business. The breakup of funds not received for advisory business is provided by the replying notices as follows:

    Sr. No. Date Amount Description 1 30.11.2015 10000/- Account Opening Fund by Partners 2 14.12.2015 30000/- Cash Deposited by Partner 3 24.06.2016 110000/- Wrong credit in Account, reversed immediately Total 1,50,000/-

    14. I note that if an entity is engaged in providing advice relating to investing in, purchasing, selling or otherwise dealing in securities or investment products, and advice on investment portfolio containing securities or investment products, whether written, oral or through any other means of communication for the benefit of the client in lieu of consideration, including entities which are holding themselves out as investment advisers, will be covered by the definition of “Investment Adviser” as given in Regulation 2(1)(m) of the IA Regulations, 2013. I, therefore, find that Noticees were acting as investment adviser, as defined under Regulation 2(1)(m) of the IA Regulations, 2013.

    15. I also note that, it is imperative that any person carrying out investment advisory activities has to necessarily obtain registration from SEBI and conduct its activities in accordance with the provisions of SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulations framed thereunder. Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 reads as under:

    “No stock broker, sub broker, share transfer agent, banker to an issue, trustee of trust deed, registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter, portfolio manager, investment adviser and such other intermediary who may be associated with securities market shall buy, sell or deal in securities except under, and in accordance with, the conditions of a certificate of registration obtained from the Board in accordance with the regulations made under this Act:”

    16. It is relevant to note that in order to protect the interest of investors and to preserve the integrity of the securities market, IA Regulations, 2013 has been framed by SEBI which provide various safeguards to ensure that the interest of the investors who receive investment advice are protected. One such safeguard provided under the said Regulations is that any person carrying out investment advisory activities has to first obtain a certificate of registration from SEBI as mandated under Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013, which, inter alia, provides that, no person shall act as an investment adviser or hold itself out as an investment adviser unless he has obtained a certificate of registration from SEBI and it has to conduct its activities in accordance with the provisions of IA Regulations, 2013. Further safeguards provided under IA Regulations, 2013 include continued minimum professional qualification and compliance with net-worth requirement for acting as an investment adviser, prior disclosure of all conflicts of interest, prohibition on entering into transactions which are contrary to advice given to the clients at least for 15 days from the date of giving advice to the clients, mandatory risk profiling of investors, maintaining documented process for selecting investment products for clients based on client's investment objective and risk profile and understanding of the nature and risks of products or assets selected for such client, etc.

    17. I note that for seeking a certificate of registration for acting as an investment adviser, an entity is required to satisfy inter alia the following requirements, as provided under IA Regulations, 2013:

    (i) An application for seeking certificate of registration to be made to Local Office, Regional Office or Head Office, of SEBI, as the case may be, in Form A as specified in the First Schedule to IA Regulations, 2013 along with requisite non-refundable application fee;

    (ii) The applicant, in case of an individual investment adviser or its principal officer in case of a non-individual investment adviser shall be appropriately qualified and certified as under:

    a) A professional qualification or post-graduate degree or post graduate diploma (minimum two years in duration) in finance, accountancy, business management, commerce, economics, capital market, banking, insurance or actuarial science from a university or an institution recognized by the Central Government or any State Government or a recognised foreign university or institution or association or a professional qualification by completing a Post Graduate Program in the Securities Market (Investment Advisory) from NISM of a duration not less than one year or a professional qualification by obtaining a CFA Charter from the CFA Institute;

    b) An experience of at least five years in activities relating to advice in financial products or securities or fund or asset or portfolio management;

    c) Applicant in case of individual investment adviser or its principal officer in case of a non-individual investment adviser, and persons associated with investment advice shall have, at all times a certification on financial planning or fund or asset or portfolio management or investment advisory services, from (a) NISM; or (b) any other organization or institution including Financial Planning Standards Board of India or any recognized stock exchange in India provided such certification is accredited by NISM.

    (iii) Individual applicant must have net worth of not less than 5 lakh rupees and non-individual applicant must have net worth of not less than 50 lakh rupees.

    18. The activities engaged in by the Noticees, as brought out from the various materials described above, seen in the backdrop of the aforesaid regulatory provisions show that the Noticees were holding himself out and was acting as an IA, although the Noticees were not registered with SEBI in the capacity of IA. Hence, I find that these activities/representations as were being made by the Noticees without holding the mandatory certificate of registration as investment adviser, are in violation of Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(1) of the IA Regulations, 2013.

    19. I note that in the case of Shri C. Paranitharan and TrendMarket Advisory Services, SEBI had passed orders dated July 05, 2022 and July 07, 2022, respectively, inter alia directing the Noticees therein to refund the fees or consideration received from investors in respect of their unregistered investment advisory activities. In the respective appeals filed against these orders by the respective Noticees, Hon'ble SAT vide common order dated September 21, 2022 inter alia directed the appellants there into deposit the balance amount after making refunds to investors, with SEBI. It was also directed that the balance amount deposited with SEBI shall be kept in escrow account for a period of one year and be distributed to any claimants and thereafter, the remaining amount, if any, will be deposited in the Investor Protection and Education Fund.

    20. M/s GVM Research in its Axis Bank Account No. 915020057758054, as mentioned in paragraph 8 above, had received a total amount of Rs. 3,46,304.50/- during the period from November 30, 2015 to February 4, 2017 through unregistered investment advisory activities, as observed above. I further note that Noticee no. 3 received a total amount of Rs. 10,268.27/- in its Bank of India A/c 880710110005306 through PayU Money Gateway available on the website of GVM Research. I note that the replying noticees have claimed that out of the total amount received in the bank account of M/s GVM Research, a total amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- was not received on account of investment advisory services. I note that out of Rs. 1,50,000/-, the Noticees have claimed that Rs. 10,000/- were deposited as funds for opening the bank account on November 30, 2015. I find that the said claim of the Noticees is substantiated through the statement of Axis Bank Account No. 915020057758054 of GVM Research. However, the Noticees have not provided any evidence to support their claim that the remaining Rs. 1,40,000/- have not been received on account of investment advisory services. Accordingly, the Noticees are given liberty to produce the proof of the same to the Chartered Accountant, a report from whom is being directed to be submitted for certifying the refunds to be made by the Noticees.

    Directions:

    21. In view of the foregoing, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me in terms Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B(1) read with of Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992 hereby direct that:

    (a) The Noticees (M/s. GVM Research, partners - Nilesh Joshi, Yashwant Sharma and Ramesh Joshi) shall within a period of three (3) months from the date of this Order, refund the money received from any investors/clients, as fees or consideration or in any other form, in respect of his unregistered investment advisory activities.

    (b) The Noticees shall, within 15 days from the date of this Order, issue public notice in all editions of two National Dailies (one English and one Hindi) and in one local daily with wide circulation, detailing the modalities for refund, including the details of contact person such as names, addresses and contact details. A period of two (2) months from the date of the publication of the public notice shall be provided to the investors/clients for submitting their claims.

    (c) The repayments to the investors/clients shall be effected only through Bank Demand Draft or Pay Order or electronic fund transfer or through any other appropriate banking channels, which ensures audit trails to identify the beneficiaries of repayments.

    (d) Within a period of 15 days after completing the refund as directed in para 19(a) above, the Noticee shall file a report with SEBI detailing the amount refunded to investors/clients, which should be addressed to the “Division Chief, Division of Post-Inspection Enforcement Action, Market Intermediaries Regulation and Supervision Department, SEBI Bhavan II, Plot No. C7, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai-400051”. The above mentioned report should be duly certified by an independent Chartered Accountant and should indicate the amount of refund, mode of payment by bank transactions, name of the parties, communication address, mobile/telephone numbers, etc.

    (e) The remaining balance amount shall be deposited with SEBI which shall be kept in an escrow account for a period of one year for distribution to clients/investors who were availing the investment advisory services from the Noticee. Thereafter, the remaining amount, if any, shall be deposited in the Investors Protection and Education Fund, maintained by SEBI.

    (f) The Noticees are restrained from selling his assets, properties and holding of mutual funds/shares/securities held by him in demat and physical form except for the sole purpose of making the refund/depositing balance amount with SEBI, as directed above. Further, banks are directed to allow debit from the bank accounts of the Noticees, only for the purpose of making refund to the clients/investors who were availing the investment advisory services from the Noticees and for depositing balance amount with SEBI, as directed in this Order.

    (g) The Noticees are debarred from accessing the securities market, directly or indirectly and is prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities, directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever, for a period of 5 (five) months from the date of this Order or till the expiry of 5 (five) months from the date of completion of refund to clients/investors along with depositing of balance amount, if any, with SEBI, as directed in paragraph 19(a) and 19(e) above, whichever is later.

    (h) Upon submission of report on completion of refund to clients/investors to SEBI and deposit of the balance amount, if any, with SEBI, the direction at paragraph 19(f) above shall cease to operate within 15 days thereafter.

    (i) The Noticees shall not undertake, either during or after the expiry of the period of debarment/restraint as mentioned in paragraph 19(g), either directly or indirectly, investment advisory services or any activity in the securities market without obtaining a Certificate of Registration from SEBI, as required under the securities laws.

    22. The direction for refund to clients/investors and depositing the balance amount with SEBI, as given in paragraph 19(a) and 19(e) above, shall not preclude the clients/investors to pursue any other legal remedy available to them under any other law, against the Noticees for refund of money or deficiency in service, before any appropriate forum of competent jurisdiction.

    23. The above directions shall come into force with immediate effect.

    24. A copy of this Order shall be served upon the Noticee, recognized Stock Exchanges, Depositories, Banks and Registrar and Transfer Agents to ensure that the directions given above are strictly complied with.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    In Respect Of Gvm Research And Others
    (Feb 7, 2023)