Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav v. State Of Maharashtra .

    1. Heard Ms. Rachita Padwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.L. Babar, learned AGP for the respondent-State.

    2. On 1 September, 2021 we had passed the following order:—

    “2. Petitioner seeks medical termination of her pregnancy on the ground that the fetus suffers from severe anomalies. It is mentioned that presently the pregnancy is in its 20 week.

    3. Having regard to the above, we direct the Dean/Civil Surgeon of Civil Hospital, Satara to constitute a Medical Board for examination of the Petitioner. Petitioner shall report before the Medical Board within 48 hours.

    4. Let report of Medical Board be placed before this Court in sealed cover before the next date.

    5. Stand over to 7 September, 2021.”

    3. Thereafter, the following order was passed on 7 September, 2021:—

    “3. Today when the matter is called upon, learned AGP has placed before us report of the medical board dated 3 September, 2021 which we have perused. Medical board has opined that ultrasound findings of the petitioner are suggestive of congenital heart disease which are not correctable and prognosis for the fetus. Therefore, has very medical board poor has recommended medical termination of pregnancy of the petitioner.

    4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record including report of the medical board, we grant liberty to the petitioner to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy in a hospital of her choice having adequate facilities.

    5. Outcome of the procedure shall be informed to us by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the next date.

    6. Stand over to 17 September, 2021.”

    4. Today when the matter is called upon, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that medical termination of pregnancy of the petitioner was successfully carried out in the Civil Hospital at Satara whereafter she has been discharged from the hospital.

    5. In view of above, nothing survives in this Writ Petition which is accordingly disposed of.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Prabhavati Dattatray Jadhav v. State Of Maharashtra .
    (Sep 17, 2021)