Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges

    Aman Keshari Das Security Agency, Through Its Proprietor Retd. Wing Commander Aman Keshari Dash v. Union Of India, Through The Director General Resettlement And Others

    Arup Kumar Goswami, C.J.:— Heard Mr. Jitendra Pali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ramakant Mishra, learned Assistant Solicitor General, appearing for respondents No. 1 & 2, Mr. Avinash N. Mishra, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 4 and Mr. Aditya Bharadwaj, learned counsel for respondent No. 5.

    2. This writ petition is filed against an order dated 18.02.2022, whereby the petitioner was dis-empanelled under the provisions of Para 17(b) of Government of India, Ministry of Defence Office Memorandum No. 28 (75)/2020/D (Res-1) dated 13 May 2021 and Corrigendum thereto dated 23 June 2021.

    3. The petitioner is a security agency, registered under Director General of Police Resettlement, which is managed by Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare. The violations stated to have been established against the petitioner, as noted in the in the aforesaid order, read as follows:

    “(a) Quoting Service Charge as 8.37% below the prescribed rate 10% (fixed) (violations of Para 13(g)(ii) & 17(b)(vi) of Govt OM in connection with Para 2(n) of Min Wage Rate of the Govt)

    (b) Non Adherence to the min of Def Instructions/Norms of Empanelment and functioning of DGR sponsored Security Agency (violation of Para 17(b)(I) of Govt OM.

    (c) Non submission of Reports and Returns (violation of Para 17(b)(ii).(iv) & (vii))”

    4. A perusal of the aforesaid order itself shows that there is an Appellate Authority, which is Directorate General of Resettlement.

    5. In view of availability of alternative remedy, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, the writ petition is dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Aman Keshari Das Sec... v. Union Of India, Thro...
    (Mar 10, 2022)