AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The provided opinion is a short procedural order identifying two legal issues arising in the matters and directing that the matters be listed on 25.11.2019. No further factual background about the prisoners, their convictions, the specific government orders/rules, or the procedural posture beyond listing is stated.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether a person incarcerated pursuant to a sentence imposed by a criminal court can approach the writ court seeking a writ of habeas corpus for release in terms of government orders/rules providing for premature release; and, specifically, whether habeas corpus lies in such circumstances.
  2. Whether a State, without the consent of the President of India, can frame a scheme that varies from or violates Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure by providing for release of life convicts (in cases where the offence is also punishable by death) before completion of 14 years of incarceration.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The opinion does not provide the court's analysis on the identified issues. It records that the two issues arise and directs that the matters be listed on 25.11.2019 for further consideration.

Holding and Implications

LISTED for hearing on 25.11.2019.

The immediate effect is procedural: the cases were not decided on merits in the provided text and were scheduled for a future date. The opinion, as provided, does not set out any determination of rights or liabilities and does not articulate any broader legal implications or precedent.

    Home Secretary (Prison) And Others Petitioner(S) v. H. Nilofer Nisha (S).

    1. In these cases, the two issues arise. The first issue is whether a person who is behind bars because of sentence imposed to him by a criminal court can approach the writ court praying for a writ of habeas corpus that he be released in terms of some Government orders/Rules providing for pre-mature release. The issue is whether a writ of habeas corpus in such circumstances would lie or not.

    2. The second issue is whether any State without the consent of the President of India can form a scheme which is in variation or violative of the provision of Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and provide for release of prisoners who have been directed to undergo life imprisonment in cases where the offence is also punishable by death prior to their serving 14 years of incarceration.

    3. List the matters on 25.11.2019.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Home Secretary (Prison) And Others Petitioner(S) v. H. Nilofer Nisha (S).
    (Oct 17, 2019)