Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • S.V. Gangapurwala, J.: Heard.2. Rule. Rule
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • S.V. Gangapurwala, J.: Heard.2. Rule. Rule
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Shirpur Education Society, Through Its Chairman And Another v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary And Others

    S.V. Gangapurwala, J.:— Heard.

    2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.

    3. The dispute is about the intake capacity of the students of the petitioner College.

    4. The AICTE has granted permission to the petitioner Institution for admitting 120 students for diploma in Pharmacy for the year 2014-15. However, the Director of Technical Education had restricted the intake capacity of the petitioner to 60 students.

    5. This Court vide order dated 18.6.2014 had allowed the petitioner to admit 120 students, considering the interim order passed by the Apex Court in SLP(Civil) No. 7277/2014 dated 9.5.2014.

    6. It is submitted that even for the academic year 2015-16, the Apex Court has passed interim order permitting AICTE to grant extension of approval. The said academic year 2014-15 has come to an end. The interim order passed by the Apex Court is still in force.

    7. In light of the above, the Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the interim orders passed. No costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Shirpur Education So... v. State Of Maharashtra...
    (Jul 6, 2015)