Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Balwant Singh. v. State Of H.P & Others.

    Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J (Oral)

    The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

    “i) That a writ of mandamus may very kindly be issued and respondents may be directed to decide the application as made by the petitioner to Respondent No. 3 in accordance with law.

    ii) That the respondents may further be directed to restrain the Respondent No. 4 from discharging the functions of the Pradhan, Gram Panchayat Bir Bagehra, Tehsil Sujanpur, District Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh.”

    2. In the nature of the order we propose to pass in this case, it is necessary for this Court to go into the various contentions available to the petitioner and the 4th respondent since both the parties will get an opportunity before the competent authority namely 3rd respondent. Therefore, there will be a direction to the 3 respondent to look into the annexure P-3 and dispose of the same in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the 4 respondent within a period of three months from the date of production of copy of this judgment alongwith copy of writ petition by the petitioner before the 3 respondent. It will be open to both the parties to take all available contentions before the 3 respondent.

    3. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Balwant Singh. v. State Of H.P & Others.
    (Sep 20, 2011)