Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • s. 24 of Act VI, of 1871,
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • s. 24 of Act VI, of 1871,

    Zafaryab Ali v. Bakhtawar Singh

    Stuart, C.J and Brodhurst, J.:— The preliminary pleas raised in this case must be allowed, and it will go back for trial on the merits. The plaintiffs, as Muhammadans entitled to frequent the mosque and to use the other religious buildings connected with the endowment, can clearly maintain the present suit, and s. 539 of the Procedure Code has no application to such a case, the endowment in question being, in our opinion, a religious institution within the meaning of s. 24 of Act VI, of 1871, and therefore governed by Muhammadan law. We therefore remand the case under s. 562 of the Code of Procedure for trial on the merits.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Zafaryab Ali v. Bakhtawar Singh
    (Mar 27, 1883)