Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Khetty Traders v. State Of Madras

    1. We agree with the Tribunal that upholstery items like seat covers are automobile accessories. It may be that such items are strictly not necessary for running the vehicle.

    2. But, in our opinion, that is not the only test. It is certainly an accompaniment to the seat of the car but unessential for the running of the car. Once the canvass cloth has been converted into seat covers, it becomes an auto-part or accessory. On that view, the tax case is dismissed.

    3. Petition dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Khetty Traders v. State Of Madras
    (Jun 23, 1971)