AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges

    Commissioners Of Central Excise, Customs And Service Tax-Surat-I (S) v. M/S. Mk Enterprises (S).

    P.K. Das, Judicial Member:— Revenue filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), where the Adjudication order was set-aside and the appeal filed by the Respondent was allowed. On perusal of the records, we find that the Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of Cenvat Credit of Rs. 6,452.00 alongwith interest and imposed penalty. After considering the amount involved and as per Board Circular No. 21/2015 dated December 10, 2015 the monetary limit of filing appeal by the Revenue is more than Rs. 10 Lacs, we dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue without going into the merits.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioners Of Central Excise, Customs And Service Tax-Surat-I (S) v. M/S. Mk Enterprises (S).
    (Jan 7, 2016)