AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • 2014-19.Depreciation38. Clause (2), (5) and (6) of Regulation 27 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations provide that:27. Depreciation:(2)
  • Capital (IWC)42. Clause 1 (c) of Regulation 28 and Clause 5 of Regulation 3 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations
  • 2014-19.Debt: Equity32. Clause (1) and (3) of Regulation 19 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations
  • 2009-14 TARIFF PERIOD7. Clause (3) of the Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations
  • Expenses)25. Clause (g) of Regulation 19 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations
  • SECTION 64 ELECTRICITY ACT 2003
  • INCOME TAX ACT 1961
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • 2014-19.Depreciation38. Clause (2), (5) and (6) of Regulation 27 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations provide that:27. Depreciation:(2)
  • Capital (IWC)42. Clause 1 (c) of Regulation 28 and Clause 5 of Regulation 3 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations
  • 2014-19.Debt: Equity32. Clause (1) and (3) of Regulation 19 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations
  • 2009-14 TARIFF PERIOD7. Clause (3) of the Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations
  • Expenses)25. Clause (g) of Regulation 19 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations
  • SECTION 64 ELECTRICITY ACT 2003
  • INCOME TAX ACT 1961
Smart Summary

Concise Analytical Summary of the Commission's Order (Petition No. 555.TT/2014)

Factual and Procedural Background

The petitioner is Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, a transmission licensee, which filed Petition No. 555.TT/2014 seeking:

  • Revision/truing up of tariff under Regulation 6 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009 (the "2009 Tariff Regulations") for the period 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2014, based on truing up of capital expenditure; and
  • Determination of tariff under the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2014 (the "2014 Tariff Regulations") for the period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2019, in respect of the Korba Transmission System in the Western Region (the transmission asset).

Respondents are distribution licensees, mainly beneficiaries in the Western Region, procuring transmission services from the petitioner. The petitioner relied on the Commission's earlier order dated 3.4.2013 in Petition No. 145/2009 which had admitted capital cost as on 31.3.2009. The present petition was filed on 6.12.2014, notices were published under Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and no public objections were received. No submissions were made by the respondents. A hearing was held on 21.12.2015 and the petitioner supplied additional information by 28.12.2015, after which the Commission proceeded to dispose of the petition.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the Commission should carry out truing up of annual fixed charges for the 2009-14 tariff period under Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations, based on actual additional capital expenditure incurred up to 31.3.2014 and other relevant components (debt-equity, ROE grossing up, depreciation, interest on loan, IWC, O&M).
  2. Whether and how tariff for the 2014-19 tariff period should be determined under the 2014 Tariff Regulations, taking the admitted capital cost as on 31.3.2014 as opening cost and applying the relevant provisions (capital cost composition, debt-equity, ROE, depreciation, IWC, O&M norms) for the 2014-19 block.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
Order dated 3.4.2013 in Petition No. 145/2009 (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission) Admitted capital cost as on 31.3.2009 and allowance of specified additional capital expenditure and de-capitalisation for the 2009-14 tariff period. The Commission treated the admitted capital cost of Rs. 23,435.94 lakh as on 31.3.2009 as the opening capital cost as on 1.4.2009 and relied on the earlier admitted/approved additional capital expenditure framework while carrying out the truing up for 2009-14.
Order dated 8.6.2011 in Petition No. 238/2010 (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission) Held that in case of floating rate interest, changes in interest rates during the tariff period will be considered at the time of true up. The Commission referred to this principle when dealing with interest on loan (IoL). However, because cumulative depreciation exceeded cumulative normative loan balance for this asset, IoL was considered NIL (loan effectively repaid), consistent with the approach to consider interest-rate changes at truing up where relevant.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Commission's analysis follows the statutory and regulatory framework laid down in the 2009 Tariff Regulations for the 2009-14 truing up and the 2014 Tariff Regulations for the 2014-19 tariff block. The reasoning proceeds in a stepwise application of the relevant regulatory provisions to the data furnished by the petitioner:

  1. Capital cost and additional capitalisation:
    • The Commission accepted the admitted capital cost of Rs. 23,435.94 lakh as on 31.3.2009 (from its earlier order dated 3.4.2013) as opening capital cost as on 1.4.2009 in accordance with the last proviso to Regulation 7(2) of the 2009 Tariff Regulations.
    • The petitioner submitted audited details of additional capital expenditure and de-capitalisation incurred during 2009-14. The Commission found the actual additions were within the limits of total approved capital expenditure and therefore allowed the actual additional capital expenditure for truing up under Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations.
  2. Debt:Equity treatment:
    • For the opening capital cost as on 1.4.2009, the pre-1.4.2009 admitted debt:equity ratio of 50.77:49.23 (as per order dated 3.4.2013) was retained in line with Regulation 12(2) of the 2009 Regulations.
    • Any additional capitalisation on or after 1.4.2009 was serviced on a normative 70:30 debt:equity basis in accordance with Regulation 12(3) of the 2009 Regulations; the petitioner adopted a 70:30 split for the additional capital expenditure and the Commission accepted this.
    • For the 2014-19 block, the Commission treated the debt:equity ratio allowed for the period ending 31.3.2014 (51.13:48.87 as on 31.3.2014) in accordance with Regulation 19(3) of the 2014 Tariff Regulations.
  3. Return on Equity (ROE) and tax grossing up:
    • ROE was computed by grossing up the base rate (15.50%) with the applicable tax rate under Regulation 15 of the 2009 Regulations for 2009-14 and under Regulation 25 of the 2014 Regulations for 2014-19.
    • The petitioner furnished year-wise MAT rates; the Commission computed and allowed ROE after grossing up using those MAT rates. The Commission explicitly attributed the variation in ROE to changes in the applicable MAT rate.
  4. Interest on Loan (IoL):
    • Applying Regulation 16 of the 2009 Regulations (and corresponding provisions in the 2014 Regulations), the Commission examined the normative loan position. Because cumulative depreciation exceeded cumulative loan balance, the normative loan outstanding was zero. Therefore, interest on loan was considered NIL for the 2009-14 truing up and for 2014-19, consistent with the earlier Commission holding (Order dated 8.6.2011) that floating-rate interest changes are considered at truing up when relevant.
  5. Depreciation:
    • Depreciation was computed in accordance with Regulation 17 of the 2009 Regulations for the 2009-14 period and Regulation 27 of the 2014 Regulations for 2014-19. The Commission adjusted accumulated depreciation for de-capitalised assets and applied the straight-line methodology and remaining useful life provisions where applicable.
  6. Operation & Maintenance (O&M) expenses:
    • O&M norms contained in Regulation 19 of the 2009 Regulations and Regulation 29 of the 2014 Regulations were applied. Normative O&M is not subject to truing up; the Commission allowed O&M as per the applicable norms for both periods.
    • The petitioner raised a prospective wage-revision issue for 2014-19; the Commission stated that any separate application for revision due to wage revision will be considered per the 2014 Tariff Regulations.
  7. Interest on Working Capital (IWC):
    • IWC was computed per Regulation 18 of the 2009 Regulations for 2009-14 and Regulation 28 of the 2014 Regulations for 2014-19, taking components (O&M one month, maintenance spares @15% of O&M, receivables = two months fixed cost) and applying the prescribed interest rates (12.25% used in 2009-14 calculations shown; for 2014-19 the Commission applied SBI base rate + 350 bps = 13.50% as on 1.4.2014).
  8. Other items and consequential treatment:
    • Deferred tax liability prior to 1.4.2009: The petitioner sought recovery; the Commission held that deferred tax liability shall be dealt with as per Regulation 49 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations and allowed recovery whenever the liability materializes directly from beneficiaries/long-term customers/DICs.
    • Filing fee and publication expenses: The petitioner is entitled to reimbursement directly from beneficiaries on a pro rata basis in accordance with Regulation 52(1) of the 2014 Regulations.
    • Licence fee and RLDC fee & charges: The petitioner is entitled to recovery in accordance with Regulation 52(2) of the 2014 Regulations.
    • Service tax: The petitioner sought reimbursement if service tax applies in future; the Commission observed that the prayer is premature.
    • Foreign Exchange Rate Variation (FERV) on foreign loans: The petitioner's entitlement to recover FERV directly from beneficiaries or long-term customers will be as per clause (1) of Regulation 51 of the 2014 Regulations.
    • Sharing of transmission charges: Billing/collection/disbursement shall be governed by the CERC (Sharing of Inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations, 2010, as provided under Regulation 43 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations.

Holding and Implications

Core Ruling: The petition (Petition No. 555.TT/2014) is disposed of by the Commission and the trued up annual fixed charges for the 2009-14 period and the annual transmission charges for the 2014-19 period are determined and allowed in the manner set out in the order.

Specific holdings and direct effects on the parties

  • The Commission allowed the actual additional capital expenditure incurred during 2009-14 (within the previously approved limits) for the purpose of truing up under Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations.
  • Debt:equity for opening cost on 1.4.2009 remains as admitted (50.77:49.23); additional capitalisation on/after 1.4.2009 was serviced on a 70:30 basis and accepted by the Commission. For the 2014-19 block the debt:equity as on 31.3.2014 (51.13:48.87) was used as the opening composition.
  • ROE was allowed after grossing up for the applicable MAT rates; the order records allowed ROE amounts for each year of both tariff periods as computed in the order.
  • Interest on loan was considered NIL for the periods because cumulative depreciation exceeded cumulative normative loan balances (normative loan outstanding is zero).
  • Depreciation, IWC, O&M and total annual fixed charges were computed and allowed as summarized in the order for each year of 2009-14 and 2014-19 (the order contains detailed year-wise figures and component-wise tabulations which form the operative financial determinations).
  • Deferred tax liability up to 31.3.2009 may be recovered directly from beneficiaries or long-term transmission customers/DICs when it materializes, as per Regulation 49 of the 2014 Regulations.
  • Filing fee and publication expense reimbursement, licence fee and RLDC fee & charges recovery are permitted in accordance with the cited provisions of the 2014 Regulations.
  • The Commission considered the petitioner's prayer for future service tax recovery premature and did not grant a present entitlement in that respect.

The order expressly disposes of Petition No. 555.TT/2014. The Commission's determinations are made by applying the regulatory provisions quoted in the order to the data and audited certificates submitted by the petitioner; the order does not purport to set a new judicial precedent beyond the application of the cited regulations and earlier Commission orders.


This summary is drawn exclusively from the content of the provided opinion and does not add or infer facts beyond what is stated in that opinion.

    Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power Management Company Ltd.

    1. The petition has been preferred by Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner”), a transmission licensee, for revision of tariff under Regulation 6 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2009 Tariff Regulations”) based on truing up of capital expenditure for the period 1.4.2009 to 31.3.2014 and for determination of tariff under Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2014 Tariff Regulations”) for the period from 1.4.2014 to 31.3.2019 in respect of Korba Transmission System in Western Region (hereinafter referred to as “the transmission asset”).

    2. The respondents are distribution licensees, who are procuring transmission service from the petitioner, mainly beneficiaries of Western Region.

    3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:—

    a) The date of commercial operation of the transmission asset is1.4.1992 The Commission vide its order dated 3.4.2013 in Petition No. 145/2009 had approved the capital cost of Rs. 23435.94 lakh as on 31.3.2009 as under:—

    Admitted as on 31.3.2009 Amount (in Rs. lakh) Percentage (%) Debt 11897.43 50.77 Equity 11538.51 49.23 Capital Cost 23435.94 100.00

    b) The petitioner had approached the Commission vide Petition No. 145/2009 for approval of additional capital expenditure towards replacement of circuit breakers, LAs, strengthening of towers for 400 kV Itarsi-Indore ckt-II and reactors for Korba transmission system during 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12, de-capitalisation during 2009-10 and 2010-11 and determination of tariff for 2009-14 tariff period.

    c) The Commission, vide order dated 3.4.2013, had allowed an additional capital expenditure of Rs. 543.78 lakh for 2009-10, Rs. 150.97 lakh for 2010-11 and Rs. 211.57 lakh for 2011-12 and de-capitalisation of Rs. 176.74 lakh for 2009-10 and Rs. 41.70 lakh for 2010-11. The Commission determined the tariff for the transmission asset for tariff period 2009-14 based on admitted capital cost of Rs. 23435.94 lakh and estimated net additional capital expenditure of Rs. 687.88 lakh for 2009-14 tariff period as under:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Particulars 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Depreciation 377.63 408.55 425.95 436.53 436.53 Interest on Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Return on Equity 2026.67 2039.16 2047.57 2053.12 2053.12 Interest on Working Capital 150.08 156.67 163.28 170.02 176.75 O & M Expenses 1998.52 2112.17 2233.65 2361.57 2496.17 Total 4552.91 4716.55 4870.46 5021.24 5162.57

    4. As per Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations, the Commission shall carry out truing up exercise along with the tariff petition filed for the next tariff period, with respect to the capital expenditure including additional capital expenditure incurred up to 31.3.2014, as admitted by the Commission after prudence check at the time of truing up. Further, as per Regulation 15 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations, the petitioner is required to adjust the yearly impact of tax rate in the truing up petition for 2009-14 tariff period.

    5. In this context, the petitioner has filed the instant petition on 6.12.2014, for revision of tariff for the tariff period 2009-14 in accordance with Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations.

    6. The petitioner has served the petition to the respondents and notice of this application has been published in the newspaper in accordance with Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. No comments/objections have been received from the public in response to the notice in newspaper. No submissions have been made by the respondents. The hearing in this matter was held on 21.12.2015 The Commission had directed the petitioner to submit additional information latest by 28.12.2015 which has been complied by the petitioner vide affidavit dated 28.12.2015 Having heard the representatives of the petitioner and perused the material on record, we proceed to dispose of the petition.

    TRUING UP OF ANNUAL FIXED CHARGES FOR 2009-14 TARIFF PERIOD

    7. Clause (3) of the Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations provides as under:—

    “(3) The generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be, shall submit for the purpose of truing up, details of capital expenditure and additional capital expenditure incurred for the period from 1.4.2009 to 31.3.2014, duly audited and certified by the auditors”.

    8. The petitioner has submitted the information as required under the 2009 Tariff Regulations for truing up of annual fixed charges for 2009-14 tariff period. The tariff for 2009-14 tariff period has been trued up in the subsequent paragraphs.

    Capital Cost

    9. The petitioner has claimed admitted capital cost of Rs. 23435.94 lakh as on 31.3.2009 for the purpose of tariff determination.

    10. The last proviso to Regulation 7(2) of the 2009 Tariff Regulations provides that:—

    “Provided also that in case of the existing projects, the capital cost admitted by the Commission prior to 1.4.2009 duly trued up by excluding un-discharged liability, if any, as on 1.4.2009 and the additional capital expenditure projected to be incurred for the respective year of the tariff period 2009-14, as may be admitted by the Commission, shall form the basis for determination of tariff”.

    11. The admitted capital cost of Rs. 23435.94 lakh as on 31.3.2009 has been considered as opening capital cost as on 1.4.2009 for determination of trued up tariff in accordance with Regulation 7 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations.

    Additional Capital Expenditure

    12. Regulation 6(1) of the 2009 Regulations provides that:—

    “…The Commission shall carry out truing up exercise along with the tariff petition filed for the next tariff period, with respect to the capital expenditure including additional capital expenditure incurred up to 31.3.2014…”

    13. The petitioner has submitted that it has incurred a total additional capital expenditure of Rs. 543.78 lakh and de-capitalisation of Rs. 176.44 lakh during 2009-10, additional capital expenditure of Rs. 27.07 lakh during 2012-13 and Rs. 58.83 lakh during 2013-14 towards replacement of circuit breakers, surge arrestor, numeric distance relays. The petitioner has submitted Auditor Certificate dated 7.11.2014in support of claim of the actual capital expenditure incurred as depicted below:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Approved/Actual Capital cost admitted as on 31.3.2009 Add Cap/De-Cap Additional Capital Expenditure (2009-14) Capital cost as on 31.3.2014 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Approved vide order dated 3.4.2013 23435.94 Add Cap 543.78 150.97 211.57 - - 906.32 24123.82 De-cap 176.74 41.70 - - - 218.44 Net Add Cap 367.04 109.27 211.57 - - 687.88 Actual incurred during 2009-14 Add Cap 543.78 - - 27.07 58.83 629.68 23889.18 De-cap 176.44 - - - - 176.44 Net Add Cap 367.34 - - 27.07 58.83 453.24

    14. We have considered the submissions of the petitioner with regard to the actual capital expenditure during 2009-14 tariff period. Since the capital addition for 2009-14 tariff period claimed is based on actual capital expenditure incurred and is within the limits of the total approved capital expenditure, we allow the same for the purpose of revision of tariff in accordance with Regulation 6 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations.

    15. The debt:equity ratio of 70:30 for additional capital expenditure as claimed by the petitioner is in accordance with the Regulation 12 (3) of the 2009 Tariff Regulations and hence, same has been considered towards financing of the additional capital expenditure.

    Debt: Equity

    16. Regulation 12 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations provides as under:—

    “12. Debt-Equity Ratio. (1) For a project declared under commercial operation on or after 1.4.2009, if the equity actually deployed is more than 30% of the capital cost, equity in excess of 30% shall be treated as normative loan:

    Provided that where equity actually deployed is less than 30% of the capital cost, the actual equity shall be considered for determination of tariff:

    (2) In case of the generating station and the transmission system declared under commercial operation prior to 1.4.2009, debt-equity ratio allowed by the Commission for determination of tariff for the period ending 31.3.2009 shall be considered.

    (3) Any expenditure incurred or projected to be incurred on or after 1.4.2009 as may be admitted by the Commission as additional capital expenditure for determination of tariff, and renovation and modernisation expenditure for life extension shall be serviced in the manner specified in clause (1) of this regulation.”

    17. The debt: equity ratio of 50.77:49.23 as on 31.3.2009 as admitted by the Commission vide order dated 3.4.2013 in Petition No. 145/2009 has been considered as on 1.4.2009 for determination of tariff in accordance with the Regulation 12 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations. In respect of the additional capitalization, debt:equity ratio of 70:30 has been considered which is in line with the 2009 Tariff Regulations.

    18. The details of the debt:equity considered for the purpose of tariff for 2009-14 tariff period is as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Funding Capital Cost as on 31.3.2009 (%) Net Additional Capital Expenditure during 2009-14 (%) Total Cost as on 31.3.2014 (%) Debt 11897.43 50.77 317.27 70.00 12214.70 51.13 Equity 11538.51 49.23 135.97 30.00 11674.48 48.87 Total 23435.94 100.00 453.24 100.00 23889.18 100.00

    Return on Equity (‘”ROE”)

    19. Clause (3), (4) and (5) of the Regulation 15 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations provide as follows:—

    “(3) The rate of return on equity shall be computed by grossing up the base rate with the Minimum Alternate/Corporate Income Tax Rate for the year2008-09, as per the Income Tax Act, 1961, as applicable to the concerned generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be.

    (4) Rate of return on equity shall be rounded off to three decimal points and be computed as per the formula given below:

    Rate of pre-tax return on equity = Base rate/(1-t)

    Where “t” is the applicable tax rate in accordance with clause (3) of this regulation.

    (5) The generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case maybe, shall recover the shortfall or refund the excess Annual Fixed Charge on account of Return on Equity due to change in applicable Minimum Alternate/Corporate Income Tax Rate as per the Income Tax Act, 1961 (as amended from time to time) of the respective financial year directly without making any application before the Commission:

    Provided further that Annual Fixed Charge with respect to the tax rate applicable to the generating company or the transmission licensee, as the case may be, in line with the provisions of the relevant Finance Acts of the respective year during the tariff period shall be trued up in accordance with Regulation 6 of these regulations.”

    20. The variation in the tax rate during the 2009-14 tariff period applicable to the petitioner as per the Finance Act of the relevant year for the purpose of grossing up of return on equity (ROE) has been furnished as follows:—

    Year MAT Rate claimed in the current petition Grossed up ROE (Base Rate/(1-t)) claimed in the current petition 2009-10 16.995% 18.674% 2010-11 19.931% 19.358% 2011-12 20.008% 19.377% 2012-13 20.008% 19.377% 2013-14 20.961% 19.610%

    21. Regulation 15 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations provides for grossing up of ROE with the actual tax rate for the purpose of ROE. The petitioner has submitted that MAT rate was applicable during the various years of 2009-14 tariff period. The ROE has been worked out by considering year wise MAT rate submitted by the petitioner in accordance with Regulation 15 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations. The ROE allowed is as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Return on Equity 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Approved in Order dated 3.4.2013 2026.67 2039.16 2047.57 2053.12 2053.12 Claimed by the petitioner 2164.99 2254.96 2257.17 2257.96 2287.64 Allowed after true up in this Order 2164.99 2254.96 2257.17 2257.96 2287.64

    The variation in the return on equity is on account of change in the applicable MAT rate considered for the purpose of grossing up of base rate of return on equity.

    Interest on Loan (“IoL”)

    22. Regulation 16 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations provide the methodology for working out weighted average rate of IoL. The Commission in its earlier Order dated 8.6.2011 in Petition No. 238/2010 has dealt with similar issue and held that:—

    “…in case of floating rate of interest, any change in the rates of interest during the tariff period will be considered at the time of true up”.

    However, the normative loan for the transmission asset has been completely repaid since the cumulative depreciation is more than the cumulative loan balance. Further, the normative loan addition on account of additional capitalisation during the respective year is repaid through depreciation allowed during the financial year. Accordingly, in line with the Regulation 16 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations, the interest on loan has been considered as NIL as entire loan is repaid through admissible depreciation.

    Depreciation

    23. The depreciation has been worked out as per the methodology provided in the Regulation 17 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations. The accumulated depreciation corresponding to the de-capitalization assets has been adjusted to arrive the cumulative depreciation during respective year. The depreciation allowed is as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Depreciation 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Approved in Order dated 3.4.2013 377.63 408.55 425.95 436.53 436.53 Claimed by the petitioner 377.65 404.08 404.08 405.44 410.28 Allowed after true up in this Order 377.65 404.08 404.08 405.44 410.27

    The variation in depreciation is due to change in additional capital expenditure and corresponding gross block during the 2009-14 tariff period.

    Interest on Working Capital (“IWC”)

    24. The IWC has been worked out as per the methodology provided in the Regulation 18 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations and allowed as under:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Interest on Working Capital 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Approved in Order dated 3.4.2013 150.08 156.67 163.28 170.02 176.75 Claimed by the petitioner 152.96 161.09 167.20 173.64 181.09 Allowed after true up in this Order 152.95 161.06 167.19 173.63 181.08

    The variation in IWC is due to change in additional capital expenditure, corresponding receivables and change in ROE on account of variation in applicable MAT rate during the 2009-14 tariff period.

    Operation & Maintenance Expenses (“O&M Expenses”)

    25. Clause (g) of Regulation 19 of the 2009 Tariff Regulations provides the norms for O&M Expenses for the transmission system. The normative O&M Expenses are not required to be trued up. Accordingly, the total allowable O&M expenses for the instant assets have been worked out based on norms of O&M Expenses and the details are as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    O&M Expenses 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Approved in Order dated 3.4.2013 1998.52 2112.17 2233.65 2361.57 2496.17 Claimed by the petitioner 1998.52 2112.17 2233.65 2361.57 2496.17 Allowed after true up in this Order 1998.52 2112.17 2233.65 2361.57 2496.17

    APPROVED ANNUAL FIXED CHARGES FOR 2009-14 TARIFF PERIOD

    26. The detailed computation of the various components of the trued up annual fixed charges for the instant transmission assets for the tariff period 2009-14 is summarised below:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Particulars 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Depreciation Opening Gross Block 23435.95 23803.29 23803.29 23803.29 23830.36 Additional Capitalisation 367.34 0.00 0.00 27.07 58.83 Closing Gross Block 23803.29 23803.29 23803.29 23830.36 23889.19 Average Gross Block 23619.62 23803.29 23803.29 23816.83 23859.78 Rate of Depreciation (%) 1.60 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.72 Depreciable Value 21201.26 21366.56 21366.56 21378.74 21429.58 Balance useful life of the asset 12 11 10 9 8 Elapsed life 17 18 19 20 21 Remaining Depreciable Value 4531.76 4444.91 4040.83 3648.93 3282.14 Depreciation during the year 377.65 404.08 404.08 405.44 410.27 Cumulative depreciation (incl. of AAD) 16921.65 17325.73 17729.81 18135.25 18545.52 Interest on Loan Gross Normative Loan 11897.43 12154.57 12154.57 12154.57 12173.52 Cumulative Repayments upto Previous Year 11897.43 12154.57 12154.57 12154.57 12173.52 Net Loan-Opening 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Additions 257.14 0.00 0.00 18.95 41.18 Repayment during the year 257.14 0.00 0.00 18.95 41.18 Net Loan-Closing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weighted Average Rate of Interest on Loan (%)* 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Interest on Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Return on Equity Opening Equity 11538.51 11648.71 11648.71 11648.71 11656.83 Additions 110.20 0.00 0.00 8.12 17.65 Closing Equity 11648.71 11648.71 11648.71 11656.83 11674.48 Average Equity 11593.61 11648.71 11648.71 11652.77 11665.66 Return on Equity (Base Rate) (%) 15.500 15.500 15.500 15.500 15.500 MAT Rate for respective year (%) 16.995 19.931 20.008 20.008 20.961 Rate of Return on Equity (%) 18.674 19.358 19.377 19.377 19.610 Return on Equity 2164.99 2254.96 2257.17 2257.96 2287.64 Interest on Working Capital O & M Expenses 166.48 175.94 186.06 196.72 207.93 Maintenance Spares 299.78 316.83 335.05 354.24 374.42 Receivables 782.35 822.05 843.68 866.43 895.86 Total Working Capital 1248.61 1314.82 1364.79 1417.39 1478.21 Rate of Interest (%) 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 Interest of working capital 152.95 161.06 167.19 173.63 181.08 Annual Transmission Charges Depreciation 377.65 404.08 404.08 405.44 410.27 Interest on Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Return on Equity 2164.99 2254.96 2257.17 2257.96 2287.64 Interest on Working Capital 152.95 161.06 167.19 173.63 181.08 O & M Expenses 1998.52 2112.17 2233.65 2361.57 2496.17 Total 4694.11 4932.28 5062.09 5198.60 5375.15

    (*The outstanding normative loan is zero, however, the petitioner has indicated the weighted average rate of interest based on actual loan portfolio)

    DETERMINATION OF ANNUAL FIXED CHARGES FOR 2014-19 TARIFF PERIOD

    27. The petitioner has claimed the tariff charges for 2014-19 tariff period as under:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Particulars 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Depreciation 414.05 414.05 414.04 414.07 414.03 Interest on Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Return on Equity 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 Interest on Working Capital 188.29 192.53 196.87 201.31 205.94 O & M Expenses 2281.96 2358.81 2437.26 2517.67 2601.42 Total 5173.67 5254.76 5337.54 5422.42 5510.76

    28. The details submitted by the petitioner in support of its claim for interest on working capital are given hereunder:

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Particulars 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 O & M Expenses 190.16 196.57 203.11 209.81 216.79 Maintenance Spares 342.29 353.82 365.59 377.65 390.21 Receivables 862.28 875.79 889.59 903.74 918.46 Total 1394.73 1426.18 1458.29 1491.20 1525.46 Rate of Interest (%) 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 Interest 188.29 192.53 196.87 201.31 205.94

    Capital Cost

    29. Clause (3) and (6) of Regulation 9 of 2014 Tariff Regulation provide as follows:—

    “(3) The Capital cost of an existing project shall include the following:

    (a) the capital cost admitted by the Commission prior to 1.4.2014 duly trued up by excluding liability, if any, as on 1.4.2014;

    (b) additional capitalization and de-capitalization for the respective year of tariff as determined in accordance with Regulation 14; and

    (c) expenditure on account of renovation and modernisation as admitted by this Commission in accordance with Regulation 15.”

    “(6) The following shall be excluded or removed from the capital cost of the existing and new project:

    (a) The assets forming part of the project, but not in use; (b) Decapitalisation of Asset;”

    30. The capital cost of Rs. 23889.19 lakh worked out by the Commission as on 31.3.2014 has been considered as opening capital cost as on 1.4.2014 for determination of tariff in accordance with Regulation 9 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations.

    Additional Capital Expenditure

    31. The petitioner has not claimed any additional capital expenditure during the tariff period 2014-19.

    Debt: Equity

    32. Clause (1) and (3) of Regulation 19 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations provideas under:—

    “19. Debt-Equity Ratio: (1) For a project declared under commercial operation on or after 1.4.2014, the debt-equity ratio would be considered as 70:30 as on COD. If the equity actually deployed is more than 30% of the capital cost, equity in excess of 30% shall be treated as normative loan:”

    “(3) In case of the generating station and the transmission system including communication system declared under commercial operation prior to 1.4.2014, debt equity ratio allowed by the Commission for determination of tariff for the period ending 31.3.2014 shall be considered.”

    “(5) Any expenditure incurred or projected to be incurred on or after 1.4.2014 as maybe admitted by the Commission as additional capital expenditure for determination of tariff, and renovation and modernisation expenditure for life extension shall be serviced in the manner specified in clause (1) of this regulation.”

    33. The petitioner has considered the debt:equity ratio of 51.13:48.87 as on 31.3.2014, which is in line with the 2014 Tariff Regulations. The details of the debt:equity considered for the purpose of tariff for 2014-19 tariff period is as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Funding Total cost as on 1.4.2014 (%) Additional capital expenditure during 2014-19 (%) Total cost as on 31.3.2019 (%) Debt 12214.70 51.13 0.00 - 12214.70 51.13 Equity 11674.48 48.87 0.00 - 11674.48 48.87 Total 23889.18 100.00 0.00 - 23889.18 100.00

    Return on Equity (“ROE”)

    34. Clause (1) and (2) of Regulations 24 and Clause (2) of Regulation 25 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations specify as under:—

    “24. Return on Equity: (1) Return on equity shall be computed in rupee terms, on the equity base determined in accordance with regulation 19.

    (2) Return on equity shall be computed at the base rate of 15.50% for thermal generating stations, transmission system including communication system”

    “25. Tax on Return on Equity:

    (2) Rate of return on equity shall be rounded off to three decimal places and shall be computed as per the formula given below:

    Rate of pre-tax return on equity = Base rate/(1-t)

    Where “t” is the effective tax rate in accordance with Clause (1) of this regulation and shall be calculated at the beginning of every financial year based on the estimated profit and tax to be paid estimated in line with the provisions of the relevant Finance Act applicable for that financial year to the company on pro-rata basis by excluding the income of non-generation or non-transmission business, as the case may be, and the corresponding tax thereon. In case of generating company or transmission licensee paying Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), “t” shall be considered as MAT rate including surcharge and cess.”

    35. The petitioner has submitted that MAT rate is applicable to the petitioner's company. Accordingly, the MAT rate applicable during the 2013-14 has been considered for the purpose of ROE, which shall be trued up with actual tax rate in accordance with clause (3) of regulation 25 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations. The ROE has been worked out and allowed as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Return on Equity 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Opening Equity 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 Additions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Closing Equity 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 Average Equity 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 Return on Equity (Base Rate) (%) 15.500 15.500 15.500 15.500 15.500 MAT Rate for respective year (%) 20.961 20.961 20.961 20.961 20.961 Rate of Return on Equity (%) 19.610 19.610 19.610 19.610 19.610 Return on Equity 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37

    Interest on Loan (“IoL”)

    36. Clause 5 and Clause 6 of Regulation 26 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations provides that:—

    “(5) The rate of interest shall be the weighted average rate of interest calculated on the basis of the actual loan portfolio after providing appropriate accounting adjustment for interest capitalized:

    Provided that if there is no actual loan for a particular year but normative loan is still outstanding, the last available weighted average rate of interest shall be considered:

    Provided further that if the generating station or the transmission system, as the case may be, does not have actual loan, then the weighted average rate of interest of the generating company or the transmission licensee as a whole shall be considered.

    (6) The interest on loan shall be calculated on the normative average loan of the year by applying the weighted average rate of interest.”

    37. Since, the normative loan for the transmission asset has been completely repaid being cumulative depreciation is more than the cumulative loan balance. The petitioner has not claimed any interest on loan during the tariff period 2014-19.

    Depreciation

    38. Clause (2), (5) and (6) of Regulation 27 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations provide that:—

    “27. Depreciation:

    (2) The value base for the purpose of depreciation shall be the capital cost of the asset admitted by the Commission. In case of multiple units of a generating station or multiple elements of transmission system, weighted average life for the generating station of the transmission system shall be applied. Depreciation shall be chargeable from the first year of commercial operation. In case of commercial operation of the asset for part of the year, depreciation shall be charged on pro rata basis”

    “(5) Depreciation shall be calculated annually based on Straight Line Method and at rates specified in Appendix-II to these regulations for the assets of the generating station and transmission system:

    Provided that the remaining depreciable value as on 31st March of the year closing after a period of 12 years from the effective date of commercial operation of the station shall be spread over the balance useful life of the assets.

    (6) In case of the existing projects, the balance depreciable value as on 1.4.2014 shall be worked out by deducting the cumulative depreciation as admitted by the Commission upto 31.3.2014 from the gross depreciable value of the assets.”

    39. The depreciation has been worked out considering the admitted capital expenditure as on 31.3.2014 and accumulated depreciation up to 31.3.2014 The detailed calculations for depreciation for the transmission asset allowed is as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Particulars 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Depreciation Opening Gross Block 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 Additional Capitalisation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Closing Gross Block 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 Average Gross Block 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 Rate of Depreciation (%) 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 Depreciable Value 21470.34 21443.87 21443.87 21443.87 21443.87 Balance useful life of the asset 7 6 5 4 3 Elapsed life 22 23 24 25 26 Remaining Depreciable Value 2898.35 2484.30 2070.25 1656.20 1242.15 Depreciation during the year 414.05 414.05 414.05 414.05 414.05 Cumulative depreciation (incl. of AAD) 18959.57 19373.62 19787.67 20201.72 20615.77

    Operation & Maintenance Expenses (“O&M Expenses”)

    40. Clause 3(a) of Regulation 29 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations specifies the norms for O&M Expenses for the transmission system. The total allowable O&M Expenses for the instant assets have been worked out and allowed are as follows:—

    Particulars 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 400 kV Bays: No. of Bays 23 23 23 23 23 Norms (Rs. lakh/Bay) 60.300 62.300 64.370 66.510 68.710 Line: S/C Twin/Triple Conductor Line Length (km) 1617 1617 1617 1617 1617 Norms (Rs. lakh/km) 0.404 0.418 0.432 0.446 0.461 Line: D/C Twin/Triple Conductor Line Length (km) 342 342 342 342 342 Norms (Rs. lakh/km) 0.707 0.731 0.755 0.780 0.806 Total O&M Expenses (Rs. lakh) 2281.96 2358.81 2437.26 2517.67 2601.42

    41. The petitioner has further submitted that the wage revision of the employees of the petitioner company is due during 2014-19 and actual impact of wage hike which will be effective from a future date has also not been factored in fixation of the normative O&M rate specified for the 2014-19 tariff period. The petitioner has also prayed that it will approach the Commission for suitable revision in the norms of O&M Expenses for claiming the impact of such increase. We would like to clarify that any application filed by the petitioner for revision of O&M Expenses on account of wage revision will be dealt with in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the 2014 Tariff Regulations. The O&M Expenses are allowed for the instant transmission asset as per prevailing norms.

    Interest on Working Capital (“IWC”)

    42. Clause 1 (c) of Regulation 28 and Clause 5 of Regulation 3 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations specifies as follows:

    “28. Interest on Working Capital

    (c) (i) Receivables equivalent to two months of fixed cost;

    (ii) Maintenance spares @ 15% of operation and maintenance expenses specified in regulation 29; and

    (iii) Operation and maintenance expenses for one month”

    “(5) ‘Bank Rate’ means the base rate of interest as specified by the State Bank of India from time to time or any replacement thereof for the time being in effect plus 350 basis points;”

    43. The petitioner has submitted that it has computed interest on working capital for the tariff block 2014-19 considering the SBI Base Rate plus 350 basis points as on 1.4.2014 The rate of interest on working capital considered is 13.50%.

    44. The interest on working capital is worked out in accordance with Regulation 28 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations. The rate of interest on working capital considered is 13.50% (SBI Base Rate of 10% plus 350 basis points). The components of the working capital and interest thereon have been worked as follows:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Interest on Working Capital 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 O & M expenses 190.09 196.49 203.02 209.72 216.70 Maintenance Spares 342.29 353.82 365.59 377.65 390.21 Receivables 862.28 875.79 889.59 903.73 918.46 Total 1394.66 1426.10 1458.20 1491.10 1525.37 Rate of Interest (%) 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 Interest on Working Capital 188.28 192.52 196.86 201.30 205.93

    ANNUAL FIXED CHARGES FOR THE 2014-19 TARIFF PERIOD

    45. The transmission charges allowed for the instant transmission assets for the 2014-19 tariff period are summarised below:—

    (Rs. in lakh)

    Particulars 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Depreciation Opening Gross Block 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 Additional Capitalisation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Closing Gross Block 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 Average Gross Block 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 23889.19 Rate of Depreciation (%) 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 Depreciable Value 21470.34 21443.87 21443.87 21443.87 21443.87 Balance useful life of the asset 7 6 5 4 3 Elapsed life 22 23 24 25 26 Remaining Depreciable Value 2898.35 2484.30 2070.25 1656.20 1242.15 Depreciation during the year 414.05 414.05 414.05 414.05 414.05 Cumulative depreciation (incl. of AAD) 18959.57 19373.62 19787.67 20201.72 20615.77 Interest on Loan Gross Normative Loan 12214.70 12214.70 12214.70 12214.70 12214.70 Cumulative Repayments upto Previous Year 12214.70 12214.70 12214.70 12214.70 12214.70 Net Loan-Opening 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Additions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Repayment during the year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Net Loan-Closing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weighted Average Rate of Interest on Loan (%) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Interest on Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Return on Equity Opening Equity 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 Additions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Closing Equity 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 Average Equity 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 11674.48 Return on Equity (Base Rate) (%) 15.500 15.500 15.500 15.500 15.500 MAT Rate for respective year (%) 20.961 20.961 20.961 20.961 20.961 Rate of Return on Equity (%) 19.610 19.610 19.610 19.610 19.610 Return on Equity 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 Interest on Working Capital O & M Expenses 190.09 196.49 203.02 209.72 216.70 Maintenance Spares 342.29 353.82 365.59 377.65 390.21 Receivables 862.28 875.79 889.59 903.73 918.46 Total Working Capital 1394.66 1426.10 1458.20 1491.10 1525.37 Rate of Interest (%) 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 Interest of working capital 188.28 192.52 196.86 201.30 205.93 Annual Transmission Charges Depreciation 414.05 414.05 414.05 414.05 414.05 Interest on Loan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Return on Equity 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 2289.37 Interest on Working Capital 188.28 192.52 196.86 201.30 205.93 O & M Expenses 2281.96 2358.81 2437.26 2517.67 2601.42 Total 5173.66 5254.75 5337.54 5422.39 5510.76

    Deferred Tax Liability

    46. The petitioner has sought recovery of deferred tax liability before 1.4.2009 from the beneficiaries or long term consumers/DICs as and when materialized. The deferred tax liability shall be dealt as per Regulation 49 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations, as amended. Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to recover the deferred tax liability upto 31.3.2009 whenever the same gets materialized directly from the beneficiaries or long term transmission customers/DICs.

    Filing Fee and the Publication Expenses

    47. The petitioner has sought reimbursement of fee paid by it for filing the petition and publication expenses. The petitioner shall be entitled for reimbursement of the filing fees and publication expenses in connection with the present petition, directly from the beneficiaries on pro-rata basis in accordance with Regulation 52 (1) of the 2014 Tariff Regulations.

    Licence Fee & RLDC Fees and Charges

    48. The petitioner shall be entitled for reimbursement of licence fee in accordance with Regulation 52(2)(b) of the 2014 Tariff Regulations for 2014-19 tariff period. The petitioner shall also be entitled for recovery of RLDC fee & charges in accordance with Regulations 52(2)(a) of the 2014 Tariff Regulations for 2014-19 tariff period.

    Service Tax

    49. The petitioner has prayed for reimbursement of service tax if it is subjected to such tax in future. We are of the view that the petitioner's prayer is premature.

    Foreign Exchange Rate Variation

    50. The petitioner has sought recovery of FERV on foreign loans deployed under clause 50 of 2014 Tariff Regulations. The petitioner is entitled to recover the FERV directly from the beneficiaries or the long term transmission customers/DICs, as the case may be, in accordance with clause (1) of the regulation 51 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations.

    Sharing of Transmission Charges

    51. The billing, collection and disbursement of the transmission charges approved shall be governed by the provisions of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Sharing of Inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations, 2010, as amended from time to time as provided in Regulation 43 of the 2014 Tariff Regulations.

    52. This order disposes of Petition No. 555.TT/2014.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power Management Company Ltd.
    (Jan 8, 2016)