Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 114 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 114 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956
Smart Summary

Summary of Legal Opinion

Factual and Procedural Background

Applicants seek pre-arrest bail in C.R. No. 168 of 2016 registered with Borivali police station, Mumbai. The prosecution alleges that police raided "Aura Thai Spa" in Borivali (W), Mumbai and found Thai women engaged in prostitution at the premises, which the applicants/accused are said to own; the applicants are charged with running a brothel. The application was heard on first date before Mridula Bhatkar, J. The learned prosecutor informed the court that none of the victims is a minor and that, as of that date, no victim had complained of being forced into prostitution. The prosecutor sought time to obtain instructions from the investigating officer. The court granted interim pre-arrest bail and adjourned the matter to 3rd May 2016.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court's analysis, as expressed in the order, proceeded as follows:

  1. Noted the charges: Section 114 read with 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.
  2. Recorded the prosecutor's statement that none of the victims were minors and that no complaint of coercion had been made by the victims as on that date.
  3. Took into account that the matter was being heard on the first date and that the prosecutor sought time to obtain instructions from the investigating officer.
  4. On that basis, the court granted interim pre-arrest bail until the next date to enable further inquiry and to preserve the parties' positions pending instructions.
  5. Imposed specific conditions on the grant of interim bail to balance investigative interests and the liberty of the applicants.

Holding and Implications

Interim pre-arrest bail granted until 3rd May, 2016.

Direct consequences for the applicants/accused:

  • They shall be enlarged on bail upon arrest on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs. 25,000 each with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount.
  • They shall not tamper with the evidence.
  • They shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court.
  • They shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer and attend Borivali police station twice weekly (Monday and Friday) between 4:00 pm and 6:00 pm until the next date.

No broader legal implications or precedents were stated in the opinion; the order effects the immediate procedural positions of the parties pending further proceedings.

    Kashiff Khan v. State Of Maharashtra

    Mridula Bhatkar, J.:— The application is moved for pre arrest bail as the applicants/accused are facing charges for the offences punishable under Section 114 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 in C.R No. 168 of 2016 registered with Borivali police station, Mumbai.

    2. It is the case of the prosecution that police have raided one “Aura Thai Spa” situated at Borivali(W), Mumbai and found Thai women in the prostitution business at the place of which the applicants/accused are the owner. Thus, the applicants/accused are charged that they are running brothel in the said premises.

    3. On inquiry with the learned prosecutor, it is informed that none of the victim is minor and as on today there is no complaint made by any of the victim girls that either of them were forced to do the prostitution business.

    4. This is a first date. The learned prosecutor wants time to seek instructions from the investigating officer. Hence, time granted. Till then interim pre arrest bail is granted to the applicants.

    5. Stand over to 3rd May, 2016. Till then, interim pre arrest bail is granted to the applicants/accused on the following terms and conditions:

    a) In the event of arrest, the applicants/accused be enlarged on bail upon furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount;

    b) The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence;

    c) The applicants/accused shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court.

    d) The applicants shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall attend Borivali police station, Mumbai twice in a week on every Monday and Friday between 4.00 pm to 6.00 pm till the next date.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Kashiff Khan v. State Of Maharashtra
    (Apr 15, 2016)