Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    State Of U.P v. S.P Saxena Dr And Another

    Judgment

    We agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the High Court. The report of the assessors was not supplied to Respondent 1 notwithstanding the requirement of Rule 9(1) of the U.P Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947. Failure to supply the report resulted in violation of Natural Justice in any case. This failure has been considered to be fatal to the departmental proceedings so as to vitiate the order of dismissal passed against Respondent 1. We see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the High Court. The appeal, therefore, fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. The interim orders passed by this Court are vacated. The High Court's order shall be complied with within four months from today.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    State Of U.P v. S.P Saxena Dr And Another
    (Dec 11, 1986)