Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges

    Cce, Mumbai-I v. Cce, Aurangabad

    Per: Shri M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial)

    1. These all appeals are filed by the revenue against impugned Order Nos. M-I/PAP/132/2010 dtd. 19.03.2010, AGS(78)02/2010 dtd. 26.04.2010, SR/134/NGP/2010 dtd. 26.04.2010, P-II/PAP/72 to 74/2010 dtd. 29.04.2010, M-I/PAP/142 to 143/2010 dtd. 29.03.2010, SB/62/TH-I/10 dtd. 30.04.2010, AKP/139 & 140/NSK/2010 dtd. 11.05.2010.

    2. Since all the appeals raise the same question, they are being disposed by the common order. After hearing the departmental Representative and perusal of records, I find that the amount involved in these cases is less than Rs. Five Lakhs. As per the CBEC Circular Number 390/MISC./163/2010-GC dated 27th August 2011, monetary limit of Rs. Five Lakhs is fixed, for filing the appeal to the Tribunal.

    3. Since the amount is less than threshold limit, I dismiss all the appeals keeping the issue involved open for deciding in an appropriate matter.

    4. Appeals are dismissed. (Dictated in Court) (M.V. Ravindran) Saifi Member (Judicial)

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Cce, Mumbai-I v. Cce, Aurangabad
    (Jun 15, 2015)