Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Ajay Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

    ITA-79-2016 (AJAY SHARMA Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX) 27-04-2016 Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant.

    Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the respondent.

    This appeal was filed on 05.04.2016. As explained by appellant in IA No.5378/2016, the appeal is within limitation, therefore, the office objection on the point of limitation is over-ruled.

    Learned counsel for the appellant submits that other defects have already been removed.

    Also heard on the question of admission.

    Shri Lal, learned counsel for respondent on advance copy.

    It is mutually agreed by the learned counsel that the issue raised in this appeal is answered in the case of the Commissioner Income Tax, Bhopal vs. Global Reality, reported in (2015) 62 taxmann.com 204 (Madhya Pradesh) which decision has been affirmed by the Supreme Court by dismissal of SLP (Civil) No.27133/2015 vide order dated 24.09.2015.

    Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of in the light of decision rendered in the case of Commissioner Income Tax, Bhopal vs. Global Reality.

    (S.K. SETH) (H.P. SINGH) JUDGE JUDGE

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ajay Sharma v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
    (Apr 27, 2016)