Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Sec. 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Sec. 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act

    Johan Smidt v. Ram Prasad

    Harington, J.:— This Rule must be discharged. Sec. 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act given the Court power, inter alia to order a new trial to be held. It has been argued by learned Counsel in support of the Rule that the Court can only exercise the power under sec. 38, if a question of law arises, but I find no such limitation in sec. 38, and I think that the judgment in the case of Sassoon v. Harry Das Bhukut shows that a new trial may be ordered when the judgment is manifestly against the weight of evidence.

    The Rule must therefore be discharged with costs.

    Mr. H.C Dutt, Attorney for the Petitioner.

    Messrs Fox and Mundal Attorneys for the Plaintiff.

    A.K.G
    Rule discharged.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Johan Smidt v. Ram Prasad
    (Jan 30, 1911)