Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • S. 75 of the City Police Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • S. 75 of the City Police Act

    The Crown Prosecutor v. Ekambaram And Another.

    Two persons were charged before a Bench of Honorary Presidency Magistrates under S. 75 of the City Police Act with disorderly behaviour, abusing and assaulting each other and creating a disturbance. Although both the accused pleaded guilty, the learned Magistrates acquitted the 2nd accused because he was injured and the other accused was not. That however is not the strangest part of the order; for the fine imposed on the first accused was ordered to be paid as compensation to the second accused.

    Clearly this order that the fine should be paid as compensation to the other accused is illegal, there being nothing in the Criminal Procedure Code which permits of this. I am fortified in this conclusion by the expression of a similar opinion by my learned brother, Lakshmana Rao J. in Criminal Revision case No. 872 of 1937.

    This petition is allowed and the order awarding compensation to the second accused is set aside.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    The Crown Prosecutor v. Ekambaram And Another.
    (Sep 10, 1941)