Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Allahabad.4. Section 526
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Allahabad.4. Section 526
Smart Summary

Structured Summary of the Legal Opinion

Factual and Procedural Background

This is an application by Hola Ram seeking the transfer of a criminal case pending before a Special Magistrate in Lucknow to the Court of some Magistrate in Allahabad on the ground of convenience to the parties. The matter raised two preliminary questions concerning (1) whether the present application should have been made to the Bench of the High Court sitting at Lucknow; and (2) whether the Bench at Lucknow is empowered to transfer a case from Lucknow to Allahabad. The opinion references Article 14 of the United Provinces High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 and Section 526 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) in its consideration of these questions.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the present application for transfer should have been made to the Bench of the High Court sitting at Lucknow.
  2. Whether the Bench at Lucknow may transfer a case from Lucknow to Allahabad under the applicable statutory framework (Article 14 of the Amalgamation Order and Section 526 CrPC).

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court proceeded in two analytical steps corresponding to the two preliminary questions framed in the opinion.

  1. On whether a Bench at Lucknow can order transfers to Allahabad:

    The court considered Article 14 of the United Provinces High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948, and Section 526 of the CrPC. It observed that Article 14 permits the Judges of the High Court to sit either at Allahabad or at Lucknow and that, whether they sit at Allahabad or at Lucknow, all criminal Courts across the State (including those in Avadh and other areas) are subordinate to the Judges of the High Court. From this, the court concluded that Judges of the High Court, regardless of whether they sit at Allahabad or at Lucknow, may order the transfer of a case from any subordinate Court in any part of the State to any other subordinate Court in any other part of the State, provided the matter properly comes before them.

  2. On whether the present application should have been filed before the Bench at Lucknow:

    The court analyzed the proviso to Article 14 under which the Chief Justice has nominated certain Judges to sit at Lucknow "in order to exercise in respect of cases arising in such areas in Oudh as the Chief Justice may direct, the jurisdiction and power for the time being vested in the new High Court." The court identified the present application as one arising in an area in Avadh (the district of Lucknow) whose jurisdiction, for the time being, was vested in the Bench at Lucknow. The court emphasized that the applicant's request for transfer to Allahabad did not alter the fact that the application arises from Lucknow and thus falls within the Lucknow Bench's jurisdiction to hear. Accordingly, the court held that the application should have been filed before the Bench of the High Court at Lucknow, which retains the power to transfer the case to Allahabad if it so decides.

Holding and Implications

APPLICATION DISMISSED

Holding (direct ruling): The court dismissed the present application on the sole ground that it should have been filed before the Bench of the High Court sitting at Lucknow, and not on the merits of the transfer request. The dismissal was without prejudice to the applicant's right to apply to the Bench at Lucknow.

Implications: The immediate consequence is that the applicant's current filing is rejected and the applicant may re-file the transfer application before the Lucknow Bench. The opinion does not articulate any broader legal ramifications or purport to set a new precedent beyond applying Article 14 of the Amalgamation Order and Section 526 CrPC to the procedural question; therefore, no new precedent is announced in this opinion.

D.H

Disposition: Application dismissed.

    Hola Ram v. State

    1. This is an application by Hola Ram for the transfer of a criminal case pending before a Special Magistrate in Lucknow to the Court of some Magistrate in Allahabad on the ground of convenience to the parties.

    2. Two preliminary questions, however, arise in this case. The first is whether the present application for transfer should have been made to the Bench of this Court sitting at Lucknow.

    3. The second is whether it is open to the Bench at Lucknow to transfer the case from Lucknow to Allahabad. Article 14 of the United Provinces High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948, provides as follows:

    “The new High Court, and the Judges and division Courts thereof, shall sit at Allahabad or at such other places. In the United Provinces as the Chief Justice may, with the approval of the Governor of the United Provinces, appoint:

    Provided that unless the Governor of the United Provinces with the concurrence of the Chief Justice otherwise directs, such judges of the new High Court, not less than two in number, as the Chief Justice may from time to time nominate, shall sit at Lucknow in order to exercise in respect of cases arising in such areas in Oudh as the Chief Justice may direct, the jurisdiction and power for the time being vested in the new High Court:

    Provided further that the Chief Justice may in his discretion order that any case or class of cases arising in the said areas shall be heard at Allahabad.”

    4. Section 526 of the Cr PC, empowers the High Court to transfer any criminal case from one criminal Court subordinate to its authority to any other criminal Court of equal or superior jurisdiction also subordinate to its authority.

    5. It is clear from Article 14 of the Amalgamation Order that the Judges of this Court may sit either at Allahabad or at Lucknow on the ground of convenience and whether they sit at Allahabad or at Lucknow, all criminal Courts whether they are in areas in Avadh or in the remaining areas of the State are subordinate to them. It is, therefore, open to the Judges of this Court whether they sit at Allahabad or at Lucknow to order the transfer of a case from any subordinate Court in any part of the State to any other subordinate Court in any other part of the State. So far, therefore, as the second point is concerned, the fact that the Judges of this Court sit partly in Allahabad and partly in Lucknow does not affect the jurisdiction of the Judges to transfer a case pending in any part of the State to any other part of the State, provided the matter comes up before them in due course.

    6. Then I come to the question whether the present application should have been made before the Bench at Lucknow. Under the proviso to Article 14 of the Amalgamation Order, the Chief Justice has nominated certain Judges of this Court to hit at Lucknow in order to exercise, in respect of cases arising in certain areas in Avadh which include the district of Lucknow, the jurisdiction and power for the time being vested in the new High Court. The present application is for transfer of a case pending before a subordinate Court in Lucknow. It is, therefore, a case arising in suchan area in Avadh the jurisdiction and power for dealing with which is in the Bench of this Court sitting at Lucknow. The mere fact that the applicant wants the transfer of the case to Allahabad makes no difference, as the present transfer application is a case arising in such an area in Avadh the jurisdiction of which is for the time being vested in the Bench at Lucknow. I am, therefore, of opinion that the present application should be filed before the Bench of this Court at Lucknow and it will be in the power of that Bench, if it so decides, to transfer the case from a subordinate Court in Lucknow to a subordinate Court in Allahabad.

    7. I, therefore, dismiss this application on this ground alone and not on the merits and leave it open to the applicant to apply to the Bench of this Court at Lucknow.

    D.H

    8. Application dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Hola Ram v. State
    (Mar 30, 1950)