Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Marium Begum v. Banku Behary Bose

    Sanderson, C.J:— In this matter it ??? that the judgment of the first ??? was in favour of the defendants and ??? plaintiffs' suit was dismissed. The plaintiffs then filed an appeal to this Court; ??? apparently according to the judgment ??? was delivered on the 10th of ??? this year, the appellants were ??? of great laches and they had not ??? their paper book. Then, when the ??? came into the Daily List for disposal, ??? explanations were put forward by appellants. These explanations were not ??? satisfactory by the Court and the lit was that their appeal was dismissed, ??? merits of the case were not enquired ???. The applicants (the appellants in the ??? Court appeal) now apply to this Court leave to appeal to the Judicial ??? of the Privy Council.

    2. When ??? by me, the learned Counsel had to ??? that if this case were allowed to go the Privy Council the only question for ??? Judicial Committee would be whether ??? Court was right in dismissing the leal in the exercise of its discretion. ??? is therefore, no substantial question ??? involved, and the judgment of Court of appeal being one of affirmance, ??? is no right of appeal to the Privy ???. This application must, therefore, dismissed with costs.

    Mookerjee, J.:— I agree.

    3. Application dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Marium Begum v. Banku Behary Bose
    (Nov 22, 1920)