Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Appu Rao v. Ramakrishna Chattiar

    The original decree directed the execution of a muchalka by defendant, but gave plaintiff no costs. The Appellate Court decreed plaintiff's costs as well. That decree for costs was fully executed in 1883. All that was left for execution of the decree was the execution of the muchalka by the appellant. The last application for that was made on the 21st December 1894 and this application, made on the 4th September, 1899, nearly five years afterwards, was clearly barred. The applications made in 1895 and 1897 were for incidental costs in execution and were not applications for execution of the decree, or any part of it. The appeal is allowed and the petition for execution is dismissed with appellant's costs throughout.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Appu Rao v. Ramakrishna Chattiar
    (Jul 26, 1901)