Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

    Baij Nath Goenka v. Mohant Sia Ram Das

    1. It is conceded and is obvious that the attachment was not by a mortgagee, that is to say, when the attachment was made there was no mortgagee in existence as such. That being so, Section 99 of the Transfer of Property Act has no application, and the sale can be carried out in execution proceedings consequent on that attachment. With these observations, the case is sent back to the Division Bench for disposal.

    2. The costs of this reference will be costs in the appeal; hearing fee, three gold mohurs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Baij Nath Goenka v. Mohant Sia Ram Das
    (Jan 14, 1913)