Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Subhash Chauder v. State Of Punjab .

    K.P.S Sandhu, J.:— The petitioner was tried, convicted and sentenced to R.I for two years under Section 9 of the Opium Act by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Samrala vide his order dated 17.12.1984 The appeal was carried to the Court of Sessions where it failed substantially inasmuch as that the sentence of imprisonment was reduced from RI for two years to R.I for one and half years. The petitioner has come up in revision to this Court.

    2. On the last date of hearing notice regarding sentence was issued.

    3. The petitioner is a first offender and a young man of 25 years The opium allegedly recovered from him is 3 Kg. He is facing the trial since January. 1983, I think it is a fit case where a chance should be given to this young man to reclaim himself.

    4. Consequently, I suspend his sentence and order that he be released on probation on his entering into a bond of Rs. 3000/- with one surety in the like amount for a period of one year, to the satisfaction of the trial Court, undertaking to appear in the Court to receive the sentence during the said period whenever called upon to do so and in the meantime to keen peace and be of good behaviour. However the petitioner is ordered to pay Rs. 500/- as litigation expenses payable to the State. But for this modification, this revision fails and is hereby dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Subhash Chauder v. State Of Punjab .
    (Jul 10, 1985)