Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Naba Parray And Ors. v. State Of Jammu & Kashmir

    O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.:—

    We are unable to sustain the judgment of the High Court setting aside the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court. The evidence of the prosecution witnesses has not been discussed at all nor has the case against each of the individual accused been considered. The conviction is under S. 148, I.P.C. There is not even a finding about the common object of the unlawful assembly. The learned Judges of the High Court have themselves noticed that the accused had not been examined under S. 342 of the Jammu & Kashmir Criminal P. C. In the face of these infirmities it is impossible to uphold the judgment of the High Court. In the ordinary course we should have remanded the matter back to the High Court for fresh disposal of the appeal. But having regard to the passage of time and the fact that the injuries caused to the complainant are of a simple nature, we do not think it is worthwhile doing so. The appellants are acquitted and their bail bonds are cancelled.

    Order accordingly.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Naba Parray And Ors. v. State Of Jammu & Kashmir
    (Jan 22, 1979)