AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2009 INSC 776
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944
  • Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2009 INSC 776
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944
  • Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Chaudharana Steels Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Allahabad .

    Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.— In this appeal the only question that arises for consideration is whether there is power for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short “the Act”).

    2. By judgment delivered in CCE & Customs v. Punjab Fibres Ltd. (2008) 3 SCC 73 it was held that the High Court has no power to condone delay in seeking reference under Section 35-H of the Act. Doubting correctness of the view reference was made to larger Bench.

    3. By judgment dated 27-3-2009 a three-Judge Bench in CCE & Customs v. Hongo India (P) Ltd. (2009) 5 SCC 791, (2009) 4 Scale 374 concurred with the view taken by the two-Judge Bench in Punjab Fibres case (2008) 3 SCC 73. The decision has full application to the present case also.

    4. That being so this appeal deserves to be dismissed which we direct. No costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Chaudharana Steels Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Allahabad .
    (May 8, 2009)