Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
008 INSC 1023
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5, Subsection 2 of the 1983 Income Tax Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
008 INSC 1023
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5, Subsection 2 of the 1983 Income Tax Act
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Joginder Alias Jindi v. State Of Haryana .

    Order

    1. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner.

    2. Since the petitioner alleges that the offences charged are bailable offences, the High Court was not justified in holding that custodial interrogation was necessary. Section 438 CrPC in terms relates to non-bailable offences. Therefore, a petition under Section 438 CrPC in relation to bailable offences is misconceived, even if it is accepted that alleged offences are bailable. However, if the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail, the same shall be considered uninfluenced by any observations made by the High Court. The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Joginder Alias Jindi v. State Of Haryana .
    (Sep 8, 2008)