Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Acts
  • Section 5(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act

    Cit, Meerut And Another v. Morgenstern Werner .

    Order

    1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

    2. The High Court has given a specific finding that the respondent assessee had not stayed in India during the preceding 9 years and he was not an ordinary resident in India and, therefore, he would be governed by the proviso to Section 5(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.

    3. Admittedly, the assessee was a technician working with M/s Kraft Work Union (Siemens) and was drawing his salary in Germany. Hence, he was not taxable in India and therefore, his salary could not be included in the total income to be assessed in India. He was deputed by his company as a Technical Liaison Officer to provide technical guidance to M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. for which he was paid Rs 500 as daily allowance. The said allowance was exempt from income tax as per the notification dated 21-2-1989. This being a finding of fact does not call for any interference in this appeal. Hence, this appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Cit, Meerut And Another v. Morgenstern Werner .
    (Oct 24, 2002)