AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1995 INSC 647
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • The Consumer Protection Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1995 INSC 647
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • The Consumer Protection Act
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Proprietor, Jabalpur Tractors v. Sedmal Jainarain And Another

    Order

    1. Leave granted.

    2. With regard to the claim for garage charges, CS No. 49-B of 1990 on the file of the Third Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Jabalpur is pending disposal. The State Consumer Forum had also noticed it in paragraph 26 of its order and concluded that the amount claimed by M/s Jabalpur Tractors as garage charges is Rs 18,000 and this cannot be considered as the matter is already pending and is sub judice before the competent civil court. The Consumer Protection Act is not in derogation of any other law. In that view of the matter, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in the impugned order, was not justified in directing to hand over possession of the car to the respondent.

    3. The appeal is accordingly allowed and the order of the National Forum in First Appeal No. 239 of 1991 dated 18-2-1993 insofar as the garage charges are concerned is set aside. No costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Proprietor, Jabalpur Tractors v. Sedmal Jainarain And Another
    (Oct 30, 1995)