AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1990 INSC 22
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 4(1) and Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894)
  • Section 5-A of the Acquisition Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
1990 INSC 22
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 4(1) and Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894)
  • Section 5-A of the Acquisition Act
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

Five cooperative housing societies, consisting largely of lower-paid government servants, had purchased land in Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh) to build residences for their members. The State Government later issued a notification under Sections 4(1) and 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enabling the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) to acquire the same land for its own housing scheme. The societies filed six writ petitions before the Allahabad High Court challenging the acquisition. On 30 August 1988, the High Court dismissed all petitions. Each society then filed a special leave petition before the Supreme Court, which granted leave and heard the matters together as the present appeals.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether land already acquired by cooperative societies of low-paid government employees for residential purposes could be acquired by the Ghaziabad Development Authority to their prejudice.
  2. Whether, in the circumstances, invocation of the urgency clause under Section 17(1) and consequent denial of the opportunity to object under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act was justified.

Arguments of the Parties

Cooperative Societies

  • The societies had legitimately acquired the land earlier and had taken concrete steps toward providing housing for their members; the subsequent acquisition by GDA was therefore inequitable.
  • Members were denied their statutory right to file objections under Section 5-A because the State invoked the urgency clause under Section 17(1) without adequate justification.

Ghaziabad Development Authority

  • Emphasised the need for integrated, planned development of the area under its Master Plan.
  • Suggested that higher-rise (five- or six-storey) construction would optimise land use within the housing scheme.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Supreme Court undertook a fact-intensive enquiry, focusing on balancing planned urban development with the housing needs of economically weaker government employees:

  • It found the societies’ grievance genuine and held that their members should not be deprived of the residential accommodation for which they had already arranged land.
  • After reviewing membership numbers (1,739 eligible members) and financial capacity, the Court determined that allotting each member one plot of 80 sq. yds. would satisfy their requirements.
  • The Court preferred double-storey construction over the GDA’s proposal for five- or six-storey buildings, citing convenience, economy, and the likely difficulties elderly occupants would face in high-rise structures.
  • Calculations showed that roughly 20 acres would suffice for the proposed layout; the Court therefore ordered that 22 acres be excluded from the acquisition to accommodate roads and ancillary infrastructure.
  • Detailed acre-wise distribution among the societies was provided, and the parties were directed to identify the exact parcels within four weeks, prepare sketch maps, and secure formal release orders.
  • The Court encouraged the societies to form a federation to manage development and share an additional 2.83 acres equitably.
  • External development (sewerage, roads, electricity) would be executed by the GDA at Rs 100 per sq. yd., while internal development and construction would be undertaken by the societies in accordance with GDA regulations.

Holding and Implications

DISPOSED OF: The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in part, directing that 22 acres be released from the acquisition for exclusive use by the five cooperative societies, subject to the development conditions stipulated.

Implications: The decision secures residential plots for 1,739 government employees, balances individual rights with planned urban development, and dissolves all interim orders upon land identification. No wider legal precedent was expressly set beyond the equitable relief granted to the parties.

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Ghaziabad Sheromani Sahkari Avas Samiti Limited And Others v. State Of U.P And Others

    Ranganath Misra, J.— We have heard counsel for the parties at considerable length but piecemeal spread over a number of days. Special leave granted.

    2. Five cooperative societies with membership of government servant mostly of the lower strata filed six separate writ petitions before the Allahabad High Court challenging the Notification under Section 4(1) and Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894) on several grounds. The principal contentions before the High Court were twofold: (1) the cooperative societies consisting of the low paid government servants having acquired the land for the purpose of providing residential accommodation to their members, the Ghaziabad Development Authority constituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh for the same purpose should not have been permitted to acquire the said land to their prejudice; and (2) there was no justification for depriving the petitioners of their right to representation under Section 5-A of the Acquisition Act in the facts and circumstances of the case.

    3. The High Court by a common judgment dated August 30, 1988, dismissed the writ petitions by negativing the several contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners. It may be pointed out that on behalf of the Neelam Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd. two writ petitions were filed while each of the other four societies had filed one writ petition. That is how six special leave petitions were filed before this Court and have now been converted into appeals on grant of leave.

    4. Ghaziabad, within the State of Uttar Pradesh, virtually bordering Delhi is located at a distance of 28 kilometres from the New Delhi Railway Station in the trans-Jamuna area. It has of late become, apart from being a railway junction, an industrial area as also an agglomeration sufficiently developed to call it a township. A Master Plan has been drawn up for the area and some portions have been developed while the lands of the five cooperative societies have not yet been improved on account of the pendency of this group of cases.

    5. In course of the hearing of these appeals we were satisfied about the genuineness of the grievance advanced on behalf of the members through their respective cooperative societies and took the view that the members of the cooperative societies should not be denied residential accommodation for which they had taken effective steps before the acquisition for the Development Authority was notified. We took into consideration the total number of members as also the number of eligible members; the total area which the members had acquired and entrusted to the cooperative societies for construction; the capacity of the members to pay for the construction now charged by the Development Authority; the need of planned development of the area; and all other relevant facts and circumstances placed by all the parties before us and formed the opinion that it would be sufficient to meet the requirements of the members of these societies if each one of them was provided with a plot limited to an area of 80 square yards.

    6. Total members entitled to allotment are 1739. Whether it should be individual plots or double-storied construction should be permitted was seriously debated before us but we have come to the ultimate conclusion that instead of single storey construction double storey constructions would be convenient and economical. The interest of the members represented by their respective cooperative societies and the nature of the housing complex contemplated by the Development Authority have to be kept in view and the ultimate decision, keeping the interest of both, has to be taken. Counsel for the Development Authority had canvassed before us that instead of confining construction of flats to two storeys, the normal pattern of five or six storeys could be adopted. High-rise construction for the poor section of the society would not be convenient — in old age many would have movement problem; many of the necessities for living would be difficult to secure. We have, therefore, decided that the construction must be confined to two storeys only and the members of their respective societies shall make their own adjustment of the ground floor and first floor allotments. About 20 acres of land would be necessary if the double storey construction with an area of 80 square yards is adopted. Societywise particulars are provided below:

    Sl. No. Names of cooperative society Total members entitled to allotment Area in acres 1. Sarkari Karmchari Evam Mitregan Saharkari Awas Samiti Ltd. 230 2.54 2. Kendriya Karamchari Evam Mitregan Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd. 523 5.77 3. Ghaziabad Shiromani Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd. 298 3.29 4. Neelam Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd. 245 2.70 5. Asha Pushpa Vihar Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd. 443 4.87 1739 19.17 Members entitled 1739 Total area 19.17 acres (rounded to 20 acres)

    7. This area of 20 acres is inclusive of land for laying of the roads and other requirements contemplated under the development scheme. For convenience and adjustment we are of the view that two more acres of land be made available to the five cooperative societies to be shared by amicable adjustment by them. Thus from the acquisition notification 22 acres of land shall stand deleted and shall be released in accordance with the extent indicated for each of the five cooperative societies. The identification of the land to be so released shall be made within four weeks from the date of pronouncement of the order by mutual arrangement. We direct that when the land shall be so identified, the order of release from acquisition by appropriate description of the land shall be made; sketch maps showing the identified land shall also be signed by parties to avoid future litigation and made over to each of the societies.

    8. We commend that all the five cooperative societies may form themselves into a federation for the purpose of ensuring appropriate development of the area and sharing either in common or by division the 2.83 acres of extra land which is directed to be released from acquisition.

    9. It has been agreed that development charges for sewerage, electricity, road connections and the like shall be provided by the Development Authority @ Rs 100 per square yard and internal development shall be done by the societies themselves in raising the construction, the bye-laws and regulations of the Development Authority shall be strictly followed. We hope and trust that the Development Authority shall extend its cooperation in every manner to the societies to effectuate the directions made by us. We look forward to the fulfilment of the dreams of each of the members of the society in the matter of having a residential accommodation.

    10. As soon as the lands are identified and sketch maps are delivered as directed above the interim orders made by this Court shall stand dissolved.

    11. The appeals are disposed of without any order for costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ghaziabad Sheromani Sahkari Avas Samiti Limited And Others v. State Of U.P And Others
    (Jan 31, 1990)