Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Deo Kumar Singh v. Kailash Singh Opposite Party.

    1. In my opinion, the point urged on behalf of the petitioner on the authority of Sm. Fatemanesha Begum v. Sk. Mahidin, 48 Cal WN 673 (1), that, on the death of an applicant for a succession certificate the proceeding lapses and there can be no substitution of the heirs or the alleged heirs of the applicant, has got substance and must be accepted.

    2. No authority taking a contrary view has been cited before me. I am in respectful agreement with the view expressed in the Bench decision of the Calcutta High Court. I, therefore, allow this application, set aside the order dated the 28th May, 1960, of the learned Additional District Judge of Saran passed in Succession Certificate Case No. 40 of 1956. There will be no order as to costs.

    DE/C.

    3. Application allowed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Deo Kumar Singh v. Kailash Singh Opposite Party.
    (Nov 29, 1960)