Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • any.4. Section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act
  • section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
  • Kerala Co-operative Societies Act 1969
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • any.4. Section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act
  • section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
  • Kerala Co-operative Societies Act 1969
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The petitioner, a Village Extension Officer and a Government servant, challenged the recovery of certain amounts from his salary initiated by the third respondent at the request of the second respondent Co-operative society. The recovery was made under Section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner contended that since he is not a member of the society, recovery under Section 37 could not be made from him. The respondents argued that as a Government servant, the petitioner is governed by Article 89(3) of the Financial Code, which mandates recovery of dues to Co-operative societies from Government servants' salaries.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Can a Government servant resist recovery from his salary made at the request of a Co-operative society on the ground that he is not a member of the Society?

Arguments of the Parties

Petitioner's Arguments

  • Recovery under Section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act can only be made from members of the society.
  • The petitioner is not a member of the first respondent society and therefore cannot be subjected to recovery under Section 37.

Respondents' Arguments

  • The petitioner, being a Government servant, is governed by Article 89(3) of the Financial Code, which imposes a statutory obligation on the Government to recover dues from the salary of Government servants.
  • The question of membership under Section 37 need not be considered due to the overriding effect of Article 89(3).

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court analyzed Section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, which permits recovery of dues from the salary of members who have executed agreements in favor of the society. Although Section 37 mentions members, it does not prohibit execution of such agreements by non-members. The court noted that agreements for recovery from salary are often executed by non-members as per the byelaws and resolutions of societies.

Since the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act imposes a statutory obligation on the Government to recover dues from Government servants' salaries, Article 89(3) of the Financial Code applies. This provision mandates Drawing and Disbursing Officers or Treasury Officers to recover dues as per requisitions from co-operative societies.

The court held that a Government servant who has executed an agreement for recovery of dues cannot resist such recovery on the ground of non-membership. Allowing such resistance would defeat the purpose of the statutory provisions and harm the interests of society members.

Further, the court addressed the petitioner's contention about being singled out for recovery while other sureties were not proceeded against. The court directed the respondents not to discriminate against the petitioner and to take simultaneous recovery steps against the principal debtor and other sureties.

Holding and Implications

The writ petition was disposed of with the following holding:

The petitioner, a Government servant, cannot resist recovery of dues from his salary on the ground that he is not a member of the Co-operative society if he has executed an agreement for such recovery.

The respondents are directed not to discriminate against the petitioner and to pursue recovery simultaneously against all responsible parties, including principal debtors and sureties. No new precedent was established; the decision enforces the existing statutory framework under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and the Financial Code.

    J. Godwin v. Kollam District Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

    1. Can a Government servant resist recovery from his salary made at the request of a Co-operative society on the ground that he is not a member of the Society?

    2. Petitioner presently working as a Village Extension Officer is aggrieved by the steps initiated by the third respondent, for recovering certain amounts from his salary as per requisition made by the second respondent. The requisition is made under section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The contention is that the recovery under Section 37 can be made only from a member of the society. The petitioner is not a member of the first respondent society. Therefore, it is submitted that he cannot be proceeded against under section 37. Sri. P.B Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that the said question need not be considered in this case since the petitioner being a Government Servant is governed by Article 89(3) of the Financial Code.

    3. Article 89(3) of the Financial Code, to the extent relevant reads as follows:—

    Deduction of amounts due to Co-operative Societies-Where the Acts under which Co-operative Societies are registered impose a statutory obligation on Government to make recoveries from the salary of Government servants on account of dues to such Societies and also provide for the execution of an agreement by the members in favour of the Societies requiring the employer to make such recoveries it shall be obligatory on the part of Drawing and Disbursing Officers/Treasury Officers to recover such dues. The amount shown in the requisition in writing received from the Cooperative Societies shall be recovered in accordance with the following procedure:—

    (a) Where the whole or a part of the attachable portion of the salary of the Government employee concerned is already under attachment, the recoveries is already under attachment, the recoveries on account of the demands from Co-operative Societies shall be made from that portion of his salary as is not liable to attachment under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908.

    (b) Where the Government servant draws his own bills, it shall be the duty of the Head of the Office receiving the requisition from the cooperative society to send the necessary intimation to the Treasury Officer or other Disbursing Officer concerned. On receipt of such intimation the Treasury Officer or other Disbursing Officer shall make recoveries from the salary of the officer and the amounts thus recovered shall be paid to the Co-operative Society without undue delay after deducting remittance charges if any.

    (c) In the case of non gazetted Government servants, on receipt of the requisition in writing from the Society, it shall be the duty of the Drawing and disbursing Officer of the Government servant concerned to make the recoveries in satisfaction of the requisition. The Drawing and Disbursing Officer shall draw the gross amount of pay and allowances of the Government servant concerned in the usual manner, but should disburse only the net amount after making recoveries. The amount thus recovered should be paid to the Co-operative Society concerned without undue delay after deducting the remittance charges, if any.

    (d) In cases where the Government servant concerned intentionally allows his pay to remain undisbursed or undrawn with a view to evading payment on account of dues to co-operative societies, the administrative head of the Department concerned should draw the pay of the debtor - employee under intimation to him, in satisfaction of the requisition received from the co-operative society and remit the amount to the society, without undue delay, after deducting the remittance charges, if any.

    4. Section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act reads as follows :—

    “Deduction from salary to meet society's claim in certain cases:— (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, a member of a society, may execute an agreement in favour of the society providing that his employer or the officer disbursing his salary or wages shall be competent to deduct from the salary or wages payable to him by the employer, such amount as may be specified in the agreement and to pay the amount so deducted to the society in satisfaction of any debt or other demand owing by the member to the society.

    (2) On the execution of such an agreement, the employer or the officer disbursing the salary or wages of any such member as is referred to in sub section (1) shall, if so required by the society by requisition in writing and so long as such debt or demand or any part of it remains unpaid, make the deduction in accordance with the agreement and pay the amounts so deducted to the society within seven days from the date of the deduction”.

    5. A close reading of Section 37 would show that what is dealt with in the recovery of dues to the society by making deductions from salary or wages of various employees including Government servants. The Act thus provides for recovery from the salary of Government servants and execution of agreements agreeing for recovery by the employer. Recovery in such cases is an obligation on the Government Since the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act 1969 under which the Society is registered provides for a statutory obligation on Government to make recovery from the salary of Government servants. Article 89(3) of the Code comes into play. True, it is stated in Section 37 that the recovery is based on the agreements executed by members who are also employees in any sector. But it has to be noted that the section does not in any way prohibit execution of agreements by employees who are not members and recovery in terms of such agreements. Only since it is permissible, particularly as per the byelaws and resolutions of the societies, such agreements are executed by non members, agreeing for recovery from salary/wages. Having understood the meaning, purpose and consequence of an agreement executed by a Government servant and for that matter any employee, and his employer also having agreed to act in terms of the agreement, there is no justification at all in later turning round and raising objections and resisting the recovery of the dues to the society. Article 89(3) is in fact titled as “deduction of amounts due to co-operative societies”. The Government servants who have executed agreements for recovery of dues to the society by agreeing for deduction from salary/wages and other benefits cannot resist the recovery in terms of such agreements oh the ground that they are not members of the society. Any other interpretation would defeat the purpose of the provision and will only be ultimately against the interests of the members of the Society.

    6. Yet another contention is that the petitioner alone is proceeded against and their are other sureties. There will be a direction to respondents 1 and 2 not to discriminate the petitioner in the matter of recovery and steps shall simultaneously be taken against the principal debtor and other sureties also.

    7. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    J. Godwin v. Kollam District Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
    (Jan 4, 2005)