Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

      Hathising Mfg  Co  Ltd  ­  v. Cit ­ 

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL No. 479 of 2006 ========================================= HATHISING MFG. CO. LTD. ­ Appellant(s) Versus CIT ­ Opponent(s) ========================================= MS NIYATI K SHAH for Appellant(s) : 1,MR.D K.PUJ for Appellant(s) : 1, None for Opponent(s) : 1, ========================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Y.R.MEENA HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.S.DAVE Date : 21/09/2006 ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Considered the submissions. The appeal is admitted in terms of the following substantial question of law:

    "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.1,00,000/­ u/s.271B?"
    Issue notice to the other side. Paper Book be filed within three months.

    List the appeal for final hearing after three months.

    (Y.R. MEENA, ACTG. C.J.) (ANANT S. DAVE, J.) [sn devu] ps

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

      Hathising Mfg  Co  Ltd  ­  v. Cit ­ 
    (Sep 21, 2006)