Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
  • Mr. Arun Khosla with Ms. Shreeanka Kakkar
  • Advocates for Appellants. Mr. A.K. Vali with Mr. Ramesh N. Keswani
  • Mr. Tuhin
  • Advocates for Respondents.
Judges
  • Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
  • Mr. Arun Khosla with Ms. Shreeanka Kakkar
  • Advocates for Appellants. Mr. A.K. Vali with Mr. Ramesh N. Keswani
  • Mr. Tuhin
  • Advocates for Respondents.
Judges
  • Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
See more information ...
Smart Summary

Case Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The provided excerpt identifies the matter as MRIGENDRA PRITAM VIKRAMSINGH STEINER & ORS (respondents). File references appearing in the excerpt include FAO(OS)30/13 and FAO(OS)31/13. Appearances are recorded for the appellants (Mr. Arun Khosla with Ms. Shreeanka Kakkar) and for the respondents (Mr. A.K. Vali with Mr. Ramesh N. Keswani and Mr. Tuhin). The coram comprises Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri. The date on the excerpt is 22.08.2013. The excerpt refers readers to "the decision dated 22.08.2013 in FAO(OS) 684/2010" for a detailed judgment.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
the decision dated 22.08.2013 in FAO(OS) 684/2010 This information was not available in the provided opinion. This information was not available in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

This opinion excerpt does not contain the court's reasoning or analysis; it primarily records the case caption, appearances, coram and a cross-reference to another decision for a detailed judgment.

Holding and Implications

The provided opinion excerpt does not contain the court's final decision or holdings.

No broader legal implications are discussed in the provided excerpt; the excerpt directs readers to a separate decision (FAO(OS) 684/2010 dated 22.08.2013) for the detailed judgment.

Show full summary ...

    Jaswinder Singh v. Mrigendra Pritam Vikramsingh Steiner & Ors.

    MRIGENDRA PRITAM VIKRAMSINGH STEINER & ORS ..... Respondents Appearance: Mr. Arun Khosla with Ms. Shreeanka Kakkar, Advocates for appellants. Mr. A.K. Vali with Mr. Ramesh N. Keswani and Mr. Tuhin, Advocates for respondents. CORAM:

    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % For detailed judgment, the decision dated 22.08.2013 in FAO(OS) 684/2010 may be referred to.

    S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) NAJMI WAZIRI (JUDGE) AUGUST 22, 2013 FAO(OS)30/13 & FAO(OS) 31/13 Page 1

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.
    Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

    Comments

    Jaswinder Singh v. Mrigendra Pritam Vikramsingh Steiner & Ors.
    (Aug 22, 2013)