Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges

    A.V.N Tubes Ltd. v. Bharatia Cutler Hammer Ltd. .

    Gokal Chand Mital, C.J— The arbitration clause is as follows:

    “Without prejudice to the above Clause 17, of the Contract the Company, M/s. AVN Tubes Limited, reserves its right to go in for arbitration, if any dispute so arisen is not mutually settled within 3 months of such notice given by the Company to the Contractor. And, the award of the Arbitrator, to be appointed by the Company, M/s. AVN Tubes Limited, shall be final and binding on both the Company and the Contractor.”

    2. A reading of the aforesaid arbitration clause clearly shows that M/s. AVN Tubes Limited alone has been given the right to go in for arbitration. Not only this, the aforesaid course has to be followed only at the instance of the company by giving three months notice if the dispute is not mutually settled between the parties; and thirdly, the right to appoint an arbitrator has been given only to M/s. AVN Tubes Limited and the decision of the Arbitrator of M/s. AVN Tubes Ltd. is to be considered final and binding on both the parties.

    3. The cumulative effect of all the three clauses is that it is unilateral agreement. In case any one of the clauses alone had been there, that by itself may not have made the agreement unilateral.

    4. We are in agreement with the learned Single Judge that the aforesaid agreement is clearly unilateral and not enforceable in a Court of law. Dismissed.

    Appeal dismissed.
    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    A.V.N Tubes Ltd. v. Bharatia Cutler Hammer Ltd. .
    (Feb 7, 1992)