Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Abdurahiman Settu v. Muhammad Kasam Settu .

    1. The Subordinate Judge dismissed an application by the plaintiff-petitioner for payment of Rs. 1000 (Rupees One thousand) by defendant 1 to defray the expenses in a commission to examine witnesses in various places ordered to be taken out at the instance of defendant 1. The Subordinate Judge was doubtful whether he could order such costs under O. 26, R. 15 of the CPC. The “expenses of the commission” can be made to include expenses of the other parties to the litigation and can in suitable cases be ordered to be deposited by the party at whose instance the commission was taken out.

    2. The Subordinate Judge, however, expressed his view that this was not a fit case in which any such deposit should be ordered. Plaintiff's expenses incurred in the commission will of course be considered at the time of judgment when the value of the evidence obtained by this commission can be fully assessed. Petition is dismissed but in the circumstances without any order as to costs.

    C.R.K/R.G.D

    3. Petition dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Abdurahiman Settu v. Muhammad Kasam Settu .
    (Oct 29, 1948)