Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bhikaji Ramchandra.

    M.N Chandurkar, J.:— The question referred in this reference is as follows:

    “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has erred in law in deleting the penalty of Rs. 1,000 levied under section 221(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?”

    2. On the finding recorded by the Tribunal that the assessee was prevented from paying the advance tax because of financial inability, the question referred is purely a question of fact.

    3. The finding recorded by the Tribunal really is a finding fact that there was good and sufficient cause for not paying the advance tax. The question is answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee. No order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Bhikaji Ramchandra.
    (Feb 11, 1982)