Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • section 148 of the Income-tax Act (annexure-3
  • article 226 of the Constitution.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • section 148 of the Income-tax Act (annexure-3
  • article 226 of the Constitution.

    Lala Ram Vishan Das v. Income-Tax Officer.

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act (annexure-3 to the writ petition). The contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid notice does not disclose any material on the basis of which the same has been issued.

    2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we think it appropriate to dispose of this petition even at the stage of admission.

    3. On the facts an circumstances of this case, we direct the petitioner to file the return and the respondent shall, thereafter, disclose the material to the petitioner. In this view of the matter, we do not find it proper to interfere with the notice issued by the respondent, under article 226 of the Constitution. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

    4. Certified copy of this order be issued to the counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges within 24 hours.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Lala Ram Vishan Das v. Income-Tax Officer.
    (Mar 14, 1990)