Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Defining Causation Standards under FELA: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Robert McBride

Defining Causation Standards under FELA: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Robert McBride

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Defining Causation Standards under FELA CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Robert McBride (564 U.S. 685, 2011) Introduction CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Robert McBride is a landmark decision by the United...
Bullcoming v. New Mexico: Strengthening the Confrontation Clause in Forensic Evidence

Bullcoming v. New Mexico: Strengthening the Confrontation Clause in Forensic Evidence

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Bullcoming v. New Mexico: Strengthening the Confrontation Clause in Forensic Evidence Introduction Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a landmark 2011 decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing: Federal Preemption Shields Generic Drug Manufacturers from State Failure-to-Warn Liability

PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing: Federal Preemption Shields Generic Drug Manufacturers from State Failure-to-Warn Liability

Date: Jun 24, 2011
PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing: Federal Preemption Shields Generic Drug Manufacturers from State Failure-to-Warn Liability Introduction In the landmark case PLIVA, Inc., et al. v. Gladys Mensing, the United...
Freeman v. United States: Expanding Eligibility for Sentence Reduction Under §3582(c)(2)

Freeman v. United States: Expanding Eligibility for Sentence Reduction Under §3582(c)(2)

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Freeman v. United States: Expanding Eligibility for Sentence Reduction Under §3582(c)(2) Introduction Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S. 522 (2011), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision...
Preemption of State Warning Labeling Requirements for Generic Drug Manufacturers

Preemption of State Warning Labeling Requirements for Generic Drug Manufacturers

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Preemption of State Warning Labeling Requirements for Generic Drug Manufacturers Introduction PLIVA, Inc., et al. v. Gladys Mensing Actavis Elizabeth, LLC is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme...
Bankruptcy Court's Authority over State Law Counterclaims Violates Article III

Bankruptcy Court's Authority over State Law Counterclaims Violates Article III

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Bankruptcy Court's Authority over State Law Counterclaims Violates Article III Introduction In Howard K. Stern, Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, Executrix of the...
Heightened Judicial Scrutiny Applied to Content- and Speaker-Based Restrictions on Commercial Speech in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

Heightened Judicial Scrutiny Applied to Content- and Speaker-Based Restrictions on Commercial Speech in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Heightened Judicial Scrutiny Applied to Content- and Speaker-Based Restrictions on Commercial Speech in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Introduction Case: WILLIAM H. SORRELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VERMONT,...
Public Concern Requirement for Petition Clause Retaliation Claims Established

Public Concern Requirement for Petition Clause Retaliation Claims Established

Date: Jun 21, 2011
Public Concern Requirement for Petition Clause Retaliation Claims Established Introduction Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania, et al. v. Charles J. Guarnieri (564 U.S. 379, 2011) marks a significant...
Displacement of Federal Common Law by the Clean Air Act in AEP v. Connecticut

Displacement of Federal Common Law by the Clean Air Act in AEP v. Connecticut

Date: Jun 21, 2011
Displacement of Federal Common Law by the Clean Air Act in American Electric Power Company, Inc. v. Connecticut Introduction American Electric Power Company, Inc. v. Connecticut is a landmark 2011...
Due Process in Civil Contempt Proceedings: Turner v. Rogers Analysis

Due Process in Civil Contempt Proceedings: Turner v. Rogers Analysis

Date: Jun 21, 2011
Due Process in Civil Contempt Proceedings: Turner v. Rogers Analysis Introduction In Michael D. Turner v. Rebecca L. Rogers et al., 564 U.S. 431 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a critical...
Supreme Court Sets Stricter Requirements for Class Action Certification in Employment Discrimination Cases

Supreme Court Sets Stricter Requirements for Class Action Certification in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Jun 21, 2011
Supreme Court Sets Stricter Requirements for Class Action Certification in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction The landmark case WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. DUKES (564 U.S. 338) addressed...
Bond v. United States: Enhancing Individual Standing in Federalism Challenges

Bond v. United States: Enhancing Individual Standing in Federalism Challenges

Date: Jun 17, 2011
Bond v. United States: Enhancing Individual Standing in Federalism Challenges Introduction Bond v. United States (564 U.S. 211, 2011) is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses the critical...
Prohibition on Lengthening Imprisonment for Rehabilitation Purposes: Tapia v. United States

Prohibition on Lengthening Imprisonment for Rehabilitation Purposes: Tapia v. United States

Date: Jun 17, 2011
Prohibition on Lengthening Imprisonment for Rehabilitation Purposes: Tapia v. United States Introduction Alejandra Tapia, the petitioner, was convicted of smuggling unauthorized aliens into the...
J.D.B. v. North Carolina: Age as a Factor in Miranda Custody Analysis

J.D.B. v. North Carolina: Age as a Factor in Miranda Custody Analysis

Date: Jun 17, 2011
J.D.B. v. North Carolina: Age as a Factor in Miranda Custody Analysis Introduction In J.D.B. v. North Carolina (2011), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal question concerning the...
Restricting Federal Oversight on State Court Class Certifications: Insights from Smith v. Bayer

Restricting Federal Oversight on State Court Class Certifications: Insights from Smith v. Bayer

Date: Jun 17, 2011
Restricting Federal Oversight on State Court Class Certifications: Insights from Smith v. Bayer Introduction Keith Smith, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, 564 U.S. 299 (2011), addressed the delicate...
Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule: Insights from Davis v. United States

Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule: Insights from Davis v. United States

Date: Jun 17, 2011
Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule: Insights from Davis v. United States Introduction In the landmark case Willie Gene Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court...
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation: Supreme Court Refutes Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in Federal Indian Trusts

United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation: Supreme Court Refutes Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in Federal Indian Trusts

Date: Jun 14, 2011
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation: Supreme Court Refutes Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in Federal Indian Trusts Introduction In United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564...
Clarifying Liability Under SEC Rule 10b-5: Janus Capital Group v. First Derivative Traders

Clarifying Liability Under SEC Rule 10b-5: Janus Capital Group v. First Derivative Traders

Date: Jun 14, 2011
Clarifying Liability Under SEC Rule 10b-5: Janus Capital Group v. First Derivative Traders Introduction The Supreme Court case Janus Capital Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. First Derivative...
Nevada Ethics in Government Law: Upholding Legislative Recusal Standards

Nevada Ethics in Government Law: Upholding Legislative Recusal Standards

Date: Jun 14, 2011
Nevada Ethics in Government Law: Upholding Legislative Recusal Standards Introduction Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Michael A. Carrigan (564 U.S. 117, 2011) marks a significant Supreme Court...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Patent Invalidation: Microsoft v. I4I

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Patent Invalidation: Microsoft v. I4I

Date: Jun 10, 2011
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Patent Invalidation: Microsoft Corporation v. I4I Limited Partnership et al. Introduction The Supreme Court case Microsoft Corporation v. I4I Limited...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert