Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Carolina Case Commentaries

Establishing the Threshold for Summary Judgment in Negligence Cases: Insights from MOORE v. FIELDCREST MILLS, Inc.

Establishing the Threshold for Summary Judgment in Negligence Cases: Insights from MOORE v. FIELDCREST MILLS, Inc.

Date: Feb 2, 1979
Establishing the Threshold for Summary Judgment in Negligence Cases: Insights from MOORE v. FIELDCREST MILLS, Inc. Introduction MOORE v. FIELDCREST MILLS, Inc., 296 N.C. 467 (Supreme Court of North...
North Carolina Supreme Court Defines Domicile Standards for Student Voters and Judicial Review in Election Proceedings

North Carolina Supreme Court Defines Domicile Standards for Student Voters and Judicial Review in Election Proceedings

Date: Feb 2, 1979
North Carolina Supreme Court Defines Domicile Standards for Student Voters and Judicial Review in Election Proceedings Introduction The case of Roy Shelton Lloyd et al. v. R. Kenneth Babb et al....
Williams v. Carolina Power Light Company: Enhanced Standards for Summary Judgment in Negligence Claims

Williams v. Carolina Power Light Company: Enhanced Standards for Summary Judgment in Negligence Claims

Date: Jan 2, 1979
Williams v. Carolina Power Light Company: Enhanced Standards for Summary Judgment in Negligence Claims Introduction In Williams v. Carolina Power Light Company, 296 N.C. 400 (1979), the Supreme Court...
Competency of Child Witnesses and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in North Carolina Jurisprudence

Competency of Child Witnesses and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in North Carolina Jurisprudence

Date: Dec 2, 1978
Competency of Child Witnesses and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in North Carolina Jurisprudence Introduction The case of State of North Carolina v. Clinton Berry Thomas, reported at 296 N.C....
Retention of Jurisdiction in Judicial Removal Proceedings Upon Resignation: Analysis of In re Inquiry Concerning Judge Linwood T. Peoples

Retention of Jurisdiction in Judicial Removal Proceedings Upon Resignation: Analysis of In re Inquiry Concerning Judge Linwood T. Peoples

Date: Dec 2, 1978
Retention of Jurisdiction in Judicial Removal Proceedings Upon Resignation: Analysis of In re Inquiry Concerning Judge Linwood T. Peoples Introduction In In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53...
Admissibility of 'Battered Child Syndrome' Testimony and Jury Instruction Standards in State v. Wilkerson

Admissibility of 'Battered Child Syndrome' Testimony and Jury Instruction Standards in State v. Wilkerson

Date: Oct 2, 1978
Admissibility of 'Battered Child Syndrome' Testimony and Jury Instruction Standards in State v. Wilkerson Introduction State of North Carolina v. Kenneth D. Wilkerson, 295 N.C. 559 (1978), is a...
Stacking of Medical Payments in Family Automobile Policies: North Carolina's Landmark Decision

Stacking of Medical Payments in Family Automobile Policies: North Carolina's Landmark Decision

Date: Aug 2, 1978
Stacking of Medical Payments in Family Automobile Policies: North Carolina's Landmark Decision Introduction In the case of Rebecca Sumner Woods, Executrix of the Estate of John C. Woods, Deceased v....
North Carolina Supreme Court Upholds 'Peeping Tom' Statute in Banks v. State

North Carolina Supreme Court Upholds 'Peeping Tom' Statute in Banks v. State

Date: Jun 2, 1978
North Carolina Supreme Court Upholds 'Peeping Tom' Statute in Banks v. State Introduction In Banks v. State (295 N.C. 236, 1978), the Supreme Court of North Carolina addressed a pivotal...
Preserving Constitutional Rights in Confession Obtainment: Insights from STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SYLVESTER JOYNER

Preserving Constitutional Rights in Confession Obtainment: Insights from STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SYLVESTER JOYNER

Date: May 2, 1978
Preserving Constitutional Rights in Confession Obtainment: Insights from STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SYLVESTER JOYNER Introduction STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SYLVESTER JOYNER (295 N.C. 55, 1978) is a...
Favouring the Insured: Interpretation of 'Replacement Vehicle' in Collision Insurance Policies – Grant v. Emmco

Favouring the Insured: Interpretation of 'Replacement Vehicle' in Collision Insurance Policies – Grant v. Emmco

Date: May 2, 1978
Favouring the Insured: Interpretation of 'Replacement Vehicle' in Collision Insurance Policies – Grant v. Emmco Introduction The case Douglas B. Grant v. Emmco Insurance Company (295 N.C. 39)...
Welparnel Construction Co. v. Wiles: Modern Standards for Service of Process on Corporate Defendants

Welparnel Construction Co. v. Wiles: Modern Standards for Service of Process on Corporate Defendants

Date: May 2, 1978
Welparnel Construction Co. v. Wiles: Modern Standards for Service of Process on Corporate Defendants Introduction Welparnel Construction Company, Inc. v. Wiles, 295 N.C. 81 (1978), is a landmark...
STATE v. FULCHER: Redefining Kidnapping under N.C. G.S. 14-39(a)

STATE v. FULCHER: Redefining Kidnapping under N.C. G.S. 14-39(a)

Date: Apr 2, 1978
STATE v. FULCHER: Redefining Kidnapping under N.C. G.S. 14-39(a) Introduction STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID LEE FULCHER (294 N.C. 503) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of North Carolina...
Non-Appealability of Interlocutory Orders: Insights from Roberts F. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.

Non-Appealability of Interlocutory Orders: Insights from Roberts F. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.

Date: Jan 2, 1978
Non-Appealability of Interlocutory Orders: Insights from Robert F. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc. Introduction The case of Robert F. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., adjudicated by the...
Supreme Court Upholds Censure of Judge Herbert W. Hardy for Wilful Misconduct

Supreme Court Upholds Censure of Judge Herbert W. Hardy for Wilful Misconduct

Date: Jan 2, 1978
Supreme Court Upholds Censure of Judge Herbert W. Hardy for Wilful Misconduct Introduction The case of In re Inquiry Concerning Judge Herbert W. Hardy (294 N.C. 90) marks a significant moment in...
Clarification of Statute of Limitations and Tort Actions in Construction Contract Breaches: North Carolina Supreme Court in State Ports Authority v. Dickerson Inc.

Clarification of Statute of Limitations and Tort Actions in Construction Contract Breaches: North Carolina Supreme Court in State Ports Authority v. Dickerson Inc.

Date: Jan 2, 1978
Clarification of Statute of Limitations and Tort Actions in Construction Contract Breaches: North Carolina Supreme Court in State Ports Authority v. Dickerson Inc. Introduction The case of NORTH...
Revisiting Indictment Standards for Deadly Weapons: Overruling Porter in STATE v. PALMER

Revisiting Indictment Standards for Deadly Weapons: Overruling Porter in STATE v. PALMER

Date: Dec 2, 1977
Revisiting Indictment Standards for Deadly Weapons: Overruling Porter in STATE v. PALMER Introduction State of North Carolina v. James Palmer, alias James Burrell (No. 6, 1977) is a seminal decision...
Mandatory Life Sentences Not Governed by Youthful Offender Statutes: Analysis of STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THOMAS L. NICCUM

Mandatory Life Sentences Not Governed by Youthful Offender Statutes: Analysis of STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THOMAS L. NICCUM

Date: Oct 2, 1977
Mandatory Life Sentences Not Governed by Youthful Offender Statutes: Analysis of STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THOMAS L. NICCUM Introduction STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THOMAS L. NICCUM is a pivotal 1977...
Censure of Judge W. Milton Nowell: Establishing Standards for Judicial Conduct in North Carolina

Censure of Judge W. Milton Nowell: Establishing Standards for Judicial Conduct in North Carolina

Date: Sep 2, 1977
Censure of Judge W. Milton Nowell: Establishing Standards for Judicial Conduct in North Carolina Introduction The case of In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge W. Milton Nowell (293 N.C. 235) represents a...
North Carolina v. Hardy and Folston: Clarifying Burden of Proof in Jury Selection Discrimination and Admissibility of Codefendant Statements

North Carolina v. Hardy and Folston: Clarifying Burden of Proof in Jury Selection Discrimination and Admissibility of Codefendant Statements

Date: Jul 2, 1977
North Carolina v. Hardy and Folston: Clarifying Burden of Proof in Jury Selection Discrimination and Admissibility of Codefendant Statements Introduction North Carolina v. Hardy and Folston is a...
Right to Counsel of Choice and Effective Assistance: Insights from STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD ANTHONY McFADDEN

Right to Counsel of Choice and Effective Assistance: Insights from STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD ANTHONY McFADDEN

Date: May 2, 1977
Right to Counsel of Choice and Effective Assistance: Insights from STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD ANTHONY McFADDEN Introduction STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD ANTHONY McFADDEN (292 N.C. 609) is...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert