Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Hampshire Case Commentaries

Liability of Educational Institutions for Employee Misconduct: Insights from YVONNE MARQUAY a. v. MICHAEL ENO a., 139 N.H. 708

Liability of Educational Institutions for Employee Misconduct: Insights from YVONNE MARQUAY a. v. MICHAEL ENO a., 139 N.H. 708

Date: Jul 12, 1995
Liability of Educational Institutions for Employee Misconduct: Insights from YVONNE MARQUAY a. v. MICHAEL ENO a., 139 N.H. 708 Introduction The case of YVONNE MARQUAY a. v. MICHAEL ENO a., decided by...
Establishing Standards for Mistrial Due to Prejudicial Evidence of Prior Offenses

Establishing Standards for Mistrial Due to Prejudicial Evidence of Prior Offenses

Date: Nov 8, 1991
Establishing Standards for Mistrial Due to Prejudicial Evidence of Prior Offenses Introduction The State of New Hampshire v. Andrew Ellison, Jr. (135 N.H. 1) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Timely Objections and Mistrial Standards in Prejudicial Testimony – New Hampshire v. Killam

Timely Objections and Mistrial Standards in Prejudicial Testimony – New Hampshire v. Killam

Date: Jul 28, 1990
Standards for Timely Objections and Mistrial in Prejudicial Testimony – State of New Hampshire v. Duane Killam (133 N.H. 458) Introduction In State of New Hampshire v. Duane Killam, the Supreme Court...
Defining Implied Good Faith in Escrow Fund Distribution: Centronics Corp. v. Genicom Corp.

Defining Implied Good Faith in Escrow Fund Distribution: Centronics Corp. v. Genicom Corp.

Date: Aug 17, 1989
Defining Implied Good Faith in Escrow Fund Distribution: Centronics Corp. v. Genicom Corp. Introduction Centronics Corporation v. Genicom Corporation, 132 N.H. 133 (1989), is a landmark case...
Solicitation as a Substantial Step: Precedent from NH Supreme Court in STATE v. KILGUS

Solicitation as a Substantial Step: Precedent from NH Supreme Court in STATE v. KILGUS

Date: Oct 4, 1986
Solicitation as a Substantial Step: Precedent from NH Supreme Court in State of New Hampshire v. George W. Kilgus, Jr. Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Hampshire v. George W. Kilgus,...
State v. Bruce Berger: Expanding 'Sale' Definition and Upholding Procedural Rights in Controlled Substance Cases

State v. Bruce Berger: Expanding 'Sale' Definition and Upholding Procedural Rights in Controlled Substance Cases

Date: Jun 23, 1984
State v. Bruce Berger: Expanding 'Sale' Definition and Upholding Procedural Rights in Controlled Substance Cases Introduction The State of New Hampshire v. Bruce Berger (125 N.H. 83) is a pivotal...
Enhanced Protections Against Warrantless Seizures: Analysis of THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. FORREST J. BALL

Enhanced Protections Against Warrantless Seizures: Analysis of THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. FORREST J. BALL

Date: Dec 13, 1983
Enhanced Protections Against Warrantless Seizures: Analysis of THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. FORREST J. BALL Introduction The State of New Hampshire v. Forrest J. Ball, 124 N.H. 226 (1983), is a...
The Role of Prejudice in Admissibility of Prior Offense Evidence: Analysis of THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS P. WOODBURY

The Role of Prejudice in Admissibility of Prior Offense Evidence: Analysis of THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS P. WOODBURY

Date: Dec 8, 1983
The Role of Prejudice in Admissibility of Prior Offense Evidence: Analysis of THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS P. WOODBURY Introduction The case of THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS P....
Public Policy Exceptions to At-Will Employment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cloutier v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Public Policy Exceptions to At-Will Employment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cloutier v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Date: Oct 31, 1981
Public Policy Exceptions to At-Will Employment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cloutier v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company Introduction Cloutier v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company,...
New Hampshire Supreme Court Invalidates RSA 507-C Medical Malpractice Statute for Equal Protection Violations

New Hampshire Supreme Court Invalidates RSA 507-C Medical Malpractice Statute for Equal Protection Violations

Date: Jan 1, 1981
New Hampshire Supreme Court Invalidates RSA 507-C Medical Malpractice Statute for Equal Protection Violations Introduction In the landmark case of Kenneth E. Carson v. L. Herbert Maurer, M.D. and...
Establishing Foreseeability in Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: The Corsos v. Merrill Case

Establishing Foreseeability in Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: The Corsos v. Merrill Case

Date: Aug 21, 1979
Establishing Foreseeability in Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: The Corsos v. Merrill Case Introduction The case of VINCENT CORSO, LOLITA CORSO, a. v. STEPHEN E. MERRILL, ADMINISTRATOR,...
Thibault v. Sears: Clarifying Comparative Negligence in Strict Products Liability

Thibault v. Sears: Clarifying Comparative Negligence in Strict Products Liability

Date: Dec 1, 1978
Thibault v. Sears: Clarifying Comparative Negligence in Strict Products Liability Introduction Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck Company is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire in...
Exceeding Policy Limits: New Precedent on Damages for Breach of Insurance Contract

Exceeding Policy Limits: New Precedent on Damages for Breach of Insurance Contract

Date: Sep 28, 1978
Exceeding Policy Limits: New Precedent on Damages for Breach of Insurance Contract Introduction The case of Ronald Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company (118 N.H. 607) adjudicated by the...
Awarding Attorney Fees in Unemployment Compensation Cases: The Harkeem Decision

Awarding Attorney Fees in Unemployment Compensation Cases: The Harkeem Decision

Date: Aug 30, 1977
Awarding Attorney Fees in Unemployment Compensation Cases: The Harkeem Decision Introduction The case of James Harkeem v. Benjamin C. Adams, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Employment...
Discovery Rule in Drug-Product Liability: Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Discovery Rule in Drug-Product Liability: Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Date: Mar 1, 1977
Discovery Rule in Drug-Product Liability: Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co. Introduction The case of Arthur Raymond and Patricia Raymond v. Eli Lilly and Company (117 N.H. 164) marked a significant...
Discretionary Boundaries of Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases: STATE v. BOOTON

Discretionary Boundaries of Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases: STATE v. BOOTON

Date: Nov 30, 1974
Discretionary Boundaries of Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases: STATE v. BOOTON Introduction State of New Hampshire v. Frances Booton (114 N.H. 750, 1974) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.: Redefining At-Will Employment and Protecting Against Malicious Termination

Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.: Redefining At-Will Employment and Protecting Against Malicious Termination

Date: Mar 1, 1974
Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.: Redefining At-Will Employment and Protecting Against Malicious Termination Introduction Olga Monge, a former employee of Beebe Rubber Company, filed a lawsuit alleging...
Zoning Ordinances Validly Restrict Expansion and Control Total Mobile Home Numbers: Riverview Park v. Hinsdale

Zoning Ordinances Validly Restrict Expansion and Control Total Mobile Home Numbers: Riverview Park v. Hinsdale

Date: Dec 29, 1973
Zoning Ordinances Validly Restrict Expansion and Control Total Mobile Home Numbers: Riverview Park, Inc. Gateway Equipment Co. v. Town of Hinsdale, 113 N.H. 693 (1973) Introduction The case of...
New Hampshire's Choice-of-Law Framework in Negligence Actions: Lillian Clark v. Albert Clark

New Hampshire's Choice-of-Law Framework in Negligence Actions: Lillian Clark v. Albert Clark

Date: Sep 1, 1966
New Hampshire's Choice-of-Law Framework in Negligence Actions: Lillian Clark v. Albert Clark Introduction Lillian Clark v. Albert Clark is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire...
Parent-Child Liability in Tort: Establishing the Right of Employed Minor Children to Sue Parents for Negligence

Parent-Child Liability in Tort: Establishing the Right of Employed Minor Children to Sue Parents for Negligence

Date: Jun 4, 1930
Parent-Child Liability in Tort: Establishing the Right of Employed Minor Children to Sue Parents for Negligence Introduction The case of Lloyd W. Dunlap v. Walter E. Dunlap (84 N.H. 352), decided by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert