Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kentucky Case Commentaries

Enforcing Written Judgments and Proper Correction of Clerical Errors: Machniak v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Enforcing Written Judgments and Proper Correction of Clerical Errors: Machniak v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Sep 23, 2011
Enforcing Written Judgments and Proper Correction of Clerical Errors: Machniak v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction Machniak v. Commonwealth of Kentucky is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Mandatory Factual Findings in Family Law Modification Motions: Anderson v. Johnson

Mandatory Factual Findings in Family Law Modification Motions: Anderson v. Johnson

Date: Sep 23, 2011
Mandatory Factual Findings in Family Law Modification Motions: Anderson v. Johnson Introduction Anderson v. Johnson, 350 S.W.3d 453 (Ky. 2011), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Kentucky...
Kentucky Supreme Court Reinforces Economic Loss Rule in Giddings Lewis v. Industrial Risk Insurers

Kentucky Supreme Court Reinforces Economic Loss Rule in Giddings Lewis v. Industrial Risk Insurers

Date: Jun 17, 2011
Kentucky Supreme Court Reinforces Economic Loss Rule in Giddings Lewis v. Industrial Risk Insurers Introduction In the landmark case Giddings Lewis, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers, decided on June...
Discretion in Post-Conviction DNA Testing: MOORE v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky

Discretion in Post-Conviction DNA Testing: MOORE v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Jun 17, 2011
Discretion in Post-Conviction DNA Testing: MOORE v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky Introduction The case of Brian Keith MOORE v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky revolves around a complex post-conviction petition...
Recognition of Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in Post-Conviction Relief: Hollon v. Commonwealth

Recognition of Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in Post-Conviction Relief: Hollon v. Commonwealth

Date: Apr 22, 2011
Recognition of Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in Post-Conviction Relief: Hollon v. Commonwealth Introduction Hollon v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (334 S.W.3d 431), adjudicated by the...
Confrontation Clause and Joint Trials: Insights from Quisenberry v. Commonwealth

Confrontation Clause and Joint Trials: Insights from Quisenberry v. Commonwealth

Date: Mar 25, 2011
Confrontation Clause and Joint Trials: Insights from Quisenberry v. Commonwealth Introduction The landmark case of James Quisenberry, Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellee, alongside...
Personal Jurisdiction Rejected as Claim Doesn't Arise from Enumerated Contacts: CAESARS Riverboat Casino v. Beach

Personal Jurisdiction Rejected as Claim Doesn't Arise from Enumerated Contacts: CAESARS Riverboat Casino v. Beach

Date: Mar 25, 2011
Personal Jurisdiction Rejected as Claim Doesn't Arise from Enumerated Contacts: CAESARS Riverboat Casino v. Beach Introduction In CAESARS RIVERBOAT CASINO, LLC and Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. v....
Affirmation of Criminal Abuse and Persistent Felony Offender Convictions: Bernard Mason v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Affirmation of Criminal Abuse and Persistent Felony Offender Convictions: Bernard Mason v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Jan 21, 2011
Affirmation of Criminal Abuse and Persistent Felony Offender Convictions: Bernard Mason v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction In the case of Bernard Mason v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, adjudicated...
Strict Enforcement of Appellate Brief Procedural Rules in Pro Se Appeals

Strict Enforcement of Appellate Brief Procedural Rules in Pro Se Appeals

Date: Jan 15, 2011
Strict Enforcement of Appellate Brief Procedural Rules in Pro Se Appeals Introduction The case of Vaughn Hallis v. Cathleen Hallis (328 S.W.3d 694) adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky on...
Preserving Jury Rights and Broad Form Severance Deed Interpretation: Insights from Hazard Coal Corp. v. Knight

Preserving Jury Rights and Broad Form Severance Deed Interpretation: Insights from Hazard Coal Corp. v. Knight

Date: Dec 17, 2010
Preserving Jury Rights and Broad Form Severance Deed Interpretation: Insights from Hazard Coal Corp. v. Knight Introduction In the landmark case of Hazard Coal Corporation et al. v. Knight, the...
Presumption of Validity for Rejections of Workers' Compensation: Blackstone Mining v. Travelers Insurance

Presumption of Validity for Rejections of Workers' Compensation: Blackstone Mining v. Travelers Insurance

Date: Dec 17, 2010
Presumption of Validity for Rejections of Workers' Compensation: Blackstone Mining v. Travelers Insurance Introduction Blackstone Mining Company, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Company is a pivotal case...
Vacating Fines and Court Costs for Indigent Defendants under KRS 534.040: Analysis of Zelnar Travis and William Dawson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Vacating Fines and Court Costs for Indigent Defendants under KRS 534.040: Analysis of Zelnar Travis and William Dawson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Dec 17, 2010
Vacating Fines and Court Costs for Indigent Defendants under KRS 534.040: Analysis of Zelnar Travis and William Dawson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction In the landmark case of Zelnar Travis...
Admissibility of Common Insurance Evidence for Witness Bias: Upholding Judicial Discretion under Kentucky Rules of Evidence

Admissibility of Common Insurance Evidence for Witness Bias: Upholding Judicial Discretion under Kentucky Rules of Evidence

Date: Oct 22, 2010
Admissibility of Common Insurance Evidence for Witness Bias: Upholding Judicial Discretion under Kentucky Rules of Evidence Introduction In the case of Jerry Woolum, M.D., Individually; Woolum...
Affirmation of the 'Reasonable Probability' Standard under KRS 422.285 in BOWLING v. COMmonwealth

Affirmation of the 'Reasonable Probability' Standard under KRS 422.285 in BOWLING v. COMmonwealth

Date: Sep 24, 2010
Affirmation of the 'Reasonable Probability' Standard under KRS 422.285 in BOWLING v. COMmonwealth Introduction Thomas Clyde Bowling was convicted in Fayette Circuit Court in 1990 for the murders of...
Clarification of Jury Note Usage in Deliberations: Barnett v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Clarification of Jury Note Usage in Deliberations: Barnett v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Aug 27, 2010
Clarification of Jury Note Usage in Deliberations: Barnett v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction James H. Barnett appealed his conviction for wanton murder and theft in the case James H. Barnett...
Recognition of Non-Parent Co-Parenting Partnerships in Custody Determinations

Recognition of Non-Parent Co-Parenting Partnerships in Custody Determinations

Date: Aug 27, 2010
Recognition of Non-Parent Co-Parenting Partnerships in Custody Determinations Introduction The case of Arminta Jane Mullins v. Phyllis Dianne Picklesimer, 317 S.W.3d 569 (Ky. 2010), represents a...
Comprehensive Commentary on Judicial Decisions

Comprehensive Commentary on Judicial Decisions

Date: Aug 27, 2010
Comprehensive Commentary on Judicial Decisions United States v. Damarlon Cenaka Thomas: Affirmation of Below-Guidelines Sentencing for Career Offenders Introduction In the case of United States of...
Kentucky Supreme Court Reinforces Comparative Fault in Open and Obvious Premises Liability: Kentucky River Medical Center v. McIntosh

Kentucky Supreme Court Reinforces Comparative Fault in Open and Obvious Premises Liability: Kentucky River Medical Center v. McIntosh

Date: Aug 27, 2010
Kentucky Supreme Court Reinforces Comparative Fault in Open and Obvious Premises Liability: Kentucky River Medical Center v. McIntosh Introduction In Kentucky River Medical Center and Jackson...
Res Judicata and the Discovery Rule in FELA: Coomer v. CSX Transportation

Res Judicata and the Discovery Rule in FELA: Coomer v. CSX Transportation

Date: Aug 27, 2010
Res Judicata and the Discovery Rule in FELA: Coomer v. CSX Transportation Introduction The case of Emmett E. Coomer v. CSX Transportation, Inc., decided by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on August 26,...
Clarifying "Deadly Weapon" in Kentucky Law: New Precedent in Wilburn v. Commonwealth

Clarifying "Deadly Weapon" in Kentucky Law: New Precedent in Wilburn v. Commonwealth

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Clarifying "Deadly Weapon" in Kentucky Law: New Precedent in Wilburn v. Commonwealth Introduction In the landmark case of Essamond Wilburn v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (312 S.W.3d 321), the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert