Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

unconstitutionality-of-section-27(3f)-of-the-misuse-of-drugs-act:-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-mcmanus-v.-the-minister-for-justice-and-equality- Case Commentaries

Enhancing Confidentiality in SEP Licensing: The Landmark InterDigital v OnePlus Judgment

Enhancing Confidentiality in SEP Licensing: The Landmark InterDigital v OnePlus Judgment

Date: Feb 18, 2023
Enhancing Confidentiality in SEP Licensing: The Landmark InterDigital v OnePlus Judgment Introduction The case of InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co & Ors...
Restricting Dangerousness in Sentencing: Insights from Donoghue v R [2023] EWCA Crim 244

Restricting Dangerousness in Sentencing: Insights from Donoghue v R [2023] EWCA Crim 244

Date: Feb 18, 2023
Restricting Dangerousness in Sentencing: Insights from Donoghue v R [2023] EWCA Crim 244 Introduction In the landmark case of Donoghue v R [2023] EWCA Crim 244, the Court of Appeal for England and...
Excusable Delay in Civil Proceedings: High Court of Ireland Upholds Plaintiff’s Action in Sneyd v Stripes Support Services LTD [2023] IEHC 68

Excusable Delay in Civil Proceedings: High Court of Ireland Upholds Plaintiff’s Action in Sneyd v Stripes Support Services LTD [2023] IEHC 68

Date: Feb 18, 2023
Excusable Delay in Civil Proceedings: High Court of Ireland Upholds Plaintiff’s Action in Sneyd v Stripes Support Services LTD [2023] IEHC 68 Introduction The case of Sneyd v Stripes Support Services...
Stephen Manning v. Gearty and DPP: Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Criteria for Direct High Court Appeals

Stephen Manning v. Gearty and DPP: Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Criteria for Direct High Court Appeals

Date: Feb 18, 2023
Stephen Manning v. Gearty and DPP: Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Criteria for Direct High Court Appeals Introduction In the case of Stephen Manning v. Deirdre Gearty and The Director of Public...
Supreme Court Affirms Strict Criteria for Granting Leave to Appeal in EU Law Related Social Welfare Cases

Supreme Court Affirms Strict Criteria for Granting Leave to Appeal in EU Law Related Social Welfare Cases

Date: Feb 18, 2023
Supreme Court Affirms Strict Criteria for Granting Leave to Appeal in EU Law Related Social Welfare Cases Introduction The case of Ioan Razneas and Antonia Razneas v. Chief Appeals Officer and Others...
Strict Enforcement of the 21-Day Appeal Period in Abeyneh v Residential Tenancies Board (2023)

Strict Enforcement of the 21-Day Appeal Period in Abeyneh v Residential Tenancies Board (2023)

Date: Feb 17, 2023
Strict Enforcement of the 21-Day Appeal Period in Abeyneh v Residential Tenancies Board (2023) Introduction The case of Abeyneh v Residential Tenancies Board (Approved) [2023] IEHC 81, adjudicated by...
Binding Effect of Adjudicator Decisions and Final Account Statements in Construction Contracts

Binding Effect of Adjudicator Decisions and Final Account Statements in Construction Contracts

Date: Feb 17, 2023
Binding Effect of Adjudicator Decisions and Final Account Statements in Construction Contracts: Atalian Servest AMK Ltd v B W (Electrical Contractors) Ltd [2023] CSOH 14 Introduction The case of...
Admissibility of Evidence Involving Uncharged Co-Conspirators in Rowan & Ors v R [2023] EWCA Crim 205

Admissibility of Evidence Involving Uncharged Co-Conspirators in Rowan & Ors v R [2023] EWCA Crim 205

Date: Feb 17, 2023
Admissibility of Evidence Involving Uncharged Co-Conspirators in Rowan & Ors v R [2023] EWCA Crim 205 Introduction Rowan & Ors v R [2023] EWCA Crim 205 is a pivotal judgment delivered by the England...
Security for Costs Application and Penalty Interest Clauses: Insights from Woodstock Golf and Country Club Ltd v Pepper Finance Corporation Ltd & Anor [2023] IEHC 85

Security for Costs Application and Penalty Interest Clauses: Insights from Woodstock Golf and Country Club Ltd v Pepper Finance Corporation Ltd & Anor [2023] IEHC 85

Date: Feb 17, 2023
Security for Costs Application and Penalty Interest Clauses: Insights from Woodstock Golf and Country Club Ltd v Pepper Finance Corporation Ltd & Anor [2023] IEHC 85 Introduction In the High Court of...
High Court Clarifies Scope of Protective Costs Orders in Education and Disability Law Cases

High Court Clarifies Scope of Protective Costs Orders in Education and Disability Law Cases

Date: Feb 17, 2023
High Court Clarifies Scope of Protective Costs Orders in Education and Disability Law Cases Introduction The case of S v Minister for Education; M v. Minister for Education (Approved) [2023] IEHC 80,...
Reinterpreting 'As Soon As Reasonably Possible' in Third Party Joinder Actions: Insights from Coleman v Joyce & Ors (2023) IEHC 79

Reinterpreting 'As Soon As Reasonably Possible' in Third Party Joinder Actions: Insights from Coleman v Joyce & Ors (2023) IEHC 79

Date: Feb 17, 2023
Reinterpreting 'As Soon As Reasonably Possible' in Third Party Joinder Actions: Insights from Coleman v Joyce & Ors ([2023] IEHC 79) Introduction The case of Coleman v Joyce & Ors ([2023] IEHC 79)...
El Zubaidy v Borg: Reinforcing the Limits of Contempt Sanctions in Family Law

El Zubaidy v Borg: Reinforcing the Limits of Contempt Sanctions in Family Law

Date: Feb 16, 2023
El Zubaidy v Borg: Reinforcing the Limits of Contempt Sanctions in Family Law Introduction The case of El Zubaidy v Borg ([2023] EWCA Civ 148) represents a pivotal moment in the application of...
Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts: Reinforcing Judicial Flexibility in Addressing Fraudulent Non-Disclosure in Matrimonial Financial Relief

Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts: Reinforcing Judicial Flexibility in Addressing Fraudulent Non-Disclosure in Matrimonial Financial Relief

Date: Feb 16, 2023
Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts: Reinforcing Judicial Flexibility in Addressing Fraudulent Non-Disclosure in Matrimonial Financial Relief Introduction The case of Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts ([2023]...
Keane v Sargen & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 141: Reassessing Partnership Formation in Business Ventures

Keane v Sargen & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 141: Reassessing Partnership Formation in Business Ventures

Date: Feb 16, 2023
Keane v Sargen & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 141: Reassessing Partnership Formation in Business Ventures Introduction Keane v Sargen & Ors ([2023] EWCA Civ 141) is a landmark decision by the England and...
Criminal Assets Bureau v Browning & Ors [2023] IEHC 103: Clarifying the Scope of Section 3(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Criminal Assets Bureau v Browning & Ors [2023] IEHC 103: Clarifying the Scope of Section 3(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Date: Feb 16, 2023
Criminal Assets Bureau v Browning & Ors [2023] IEHC 103: Clarifying the Scope of Section 3(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 Introduction In the High Court of Ireland's 2023 decision Criminal...
Wrongful Interdict and Prescription: Insights from Martin McGowan v Springfield Properties PLC [2023] CSOH 12

Wrongful Interdict and Prescription: Insights from Martin McGowan v Springfield Properties PLC [2023] CSOH 12

Date: Feb 15, 2023
Wrongful Interdict and Prescription: Insights from Martin McGowan v Springfield Properties PLC [2023] CSOH 12 Introduction The case of Martin McGowan against Springfield Properties PLC ([2023] CSOH...
Allon v Rex [2023] EWCA Crim 204: Clarifying Notification Requirements Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003

Allon v Rex [2023] EWCA Crim 204: Clarifying Notification Requirements Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003

Date: Feb 15, 2023
Allon v Rex [2023] EWCA Crim 204: Clarifying Notification Requirements Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Introduction The case of Allon v Rex [2023] EWCA Crim 204 addresses crucial questions...
Establishing the Boundaries of Vicarious Liability in Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from C&S Against Norman Shaw and Live Active Leisure Ltd ([2023] CSOH 11)

Establishing the Boundaries of Vicarious Liability in Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from C&S Against Norman Shaw and Live Active Leisure Ltd ([2023] CSOH 11)

Date: Feb 15, 2023
Establishing the Boundaries of Vicarious Liability in Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from C&S Against Norman Shaw and Live Active Leisure Ltd ([2023] CSOH 11) Introduction The case of C&S Against...
Reaffirming the Standards for Genuine Visitor Applications: Commentary on PETITION OF MOHAMMED CAMARA FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW [2023] ScotCS CSOH_13

Reaffirming the Standards for Genuine Visitor Applications: Commentary on PETITION OF MOHAMMED CAMARA FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW [2023] ScotCS CSOH_13

Date: Feb 15, 2023
Reaffirming the Standards for Genuine Visitor Applications: Commentary on PETITION OF MOHAMMED CAMARA FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW [2023] ScotCS CSOH_13 Introduction The case of Mohammed Camara, a 23-year-old...
Cintra Infraestructureas International SLU v Revenue Commissioners: Defining "Land in the State" for Capital Gains Tax

Cintra Infraestructureas International SLU v Revenue Commissioners: Defining "Land in the State" for Capital Gains Tax

Date: Feb 15, 2023
Cintra Infraestructureas International SLU v Revenue Commissioners: Defining "Land in the State" for Capital Gains Tax Introduction The case of Cintra Infraestructureas International SLU v Revenue...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.