Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Reassessing Minimum Terms: Insights from Smith & Ors, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 973)

Reassessing Minimum Terms: Insights from Smith & Ors, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 973)

Date: Jul 25, 2020
Reassessing Minimum Terms: Insights from Smith & Ors, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 973) Introduction The case of Smith & Ors, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 973) presents a pivotal moment in the application of...
Preserving Jury Independence Amidst Public Health Emergencies: Commentary on GP, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1056

Preserving Jury Independence Amidst Public Health Emergencies: Commentary on GP, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1056

Date: Jul 25, 2020
Preserving Jury Independence Amidst Public Health Emergencies: Commentary on GP, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1056 Introduction The case of GP, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1056 presents a critical examination of...
C (A Child) [2020]: Precedent on Judicial Bias and Recusal in Care Proceedings

C (A Child) [2020]: Precedent on Judicial Bias and Recusal in Care Proceedings

Date: Jul 25, 2020
C (A Child) [2020]: Precedent on Judicial Bias and Recusal in Care Proceedings Introduction The case of C (A Child) [2020] EWCA Civ 987 represents a significant development in the realm of judicial...
Admissibility and Use of Indistinguishable DNA Evidence in Conspiracy Cases: R v Gabriel

Admissibility and Use of Indistinguishable DNA Evidence in Conspiracy Cases: R v Gabriel

Date: Jul 24, 2020
Admissibility and Use of Indistinguishable DNA Evidence in Conspiracy Cases: R v Gabriel Introduction The case of R v Gabriel, [2020] EWCA Crim 998 presents a landmark decision by the England and...
R v Cope [2020] EWCA Crim 1086: Extension of Time for Appeal Denied

R v Cope [2020] EWCA Crim 1086: Extension of Time for Appeal Denied

Date: Jul 24, 2020
R v Cope [2020] EWCA Crim 1086: Extension of Time for Appeal Denied Introduction The case of R. v Cope [2020] EWCA Crim 1086 addresses the critical issue of extending the time limit for lodging an...
Deceptions in Sexual Consent: The Lawrance v R Judgment Explained

Deceptions in Sexual Consent: The Lawrance v R Judgment Explained

Date: Jul 24, 2020
Deceptions in Sexual Consent: The Lawrance v R Judgment Explained Introduction The case of Lawrance, R. v ([2020] EWCA Crim 971) adjudicated by the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Williamson v Court of Appeal: Recalibrating Credit for Late Guilty Pleas in Conspiracy to Rob Cases

Williamson v Court of Appeal: Recalibrating Credit for Late Guilty Pleas in Conspiracy to Rob Cases

Date: Jul 24, 2020
Williamson v Court of Appeal: Recalibrating Credit for Late Guilty Pleas in Conspiracy to Rob Cases Introduction The case of Williamson, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 1085 adjudicated by the England and...
Randhawa v The Crown Court: Reassessment of Sentencing in Fraud Cases with Significant Mitigating Factors

Randhawa v The Crown Court: Reassessment of Sentencing in Fraud Cases with Significant Mitigating Factors

Date: Jul 24, 2020
Randhawa v The Crown Court: Reassessment of Sentencing in Fraud Cases with Significant Mitigating Factors Introduction The case of Randhawa v The Crown Court ([2020] EWCA Crim 1071) involves the...
A v. R. [2020] EWCA Crim 948: Enhancing Enforcement of Mandatory Sentencing under Section 236A CJA 2003

A v. R. [2020] EWCA Crim 948: Enhancing Enforcement of Mandatory Sentencing under Section 236A CJA 2003

Date: Jul 22, 2020
A v. R. [2020] EWCA Crim 948: Enhancing Enforcement of Mandatory Sentencing under Section 236A CJA 2003 Introduction The appellate case of A v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 948) represents a significant...
Inference from Silence under Section 34 CJPOA 1994: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dybicz v R [2020]

Inference from Silence under Section 34 CJPOA 1994: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dybicz v R [2020]

Date: Jul 22, 2020
Inference from Silence under Section 34 CJPOA 1994: A Comprehensive Analysis of Dybicz v R [2020] Introduction The case of Dybicz, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1047 involves the appellant, Krystof Dybicz,...
Reaffirmation of Jury Verdict Integrity in RN v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 937)

Reaffirmation of Jury Verdict Integrity in RN v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 937)

Date: Jul 21, 2020
Reaffirmation of Jury Verdict Integrity in RN v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 937) Introduction The case RN v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 937) adjudicated by the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Payne & Ors v. Revenue And Customs: Defining "Goods Vehicles" for Tax Purposes

Payne & Ors v. Revenue And Customs: Defining "Goods Vehicles" for Tax Purposes

Date: Jul 21, 2020
Payne & Ors v. Revenue And Customs: Defining "Goods Vehicles" for Tax Purposes Introduction The case of Payne & Ors v. Revenue And Customs [2020] EWCA Civ 889, adjudicated by the England and Wales...
Mendes v. Secretary of State for the Home Department: Establishing the Need for EU Proportionality in Interim Relief Under the EEA Regulations

Mendes v. Secretary of State for the Home Department: Establishing the Need for EU Proportionality in Interim Relief Under the EEA Regulations

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Mendes v. Secretary of State for the Home Department: Establishing the Need for EU Proportionality in Interim Relief Under the EEA Regulations Introduction Mendes v. Secretary of State for the Home...
Adverse Inferences and Section 34 CJPOA 1994: Comprehensive Analysis of Black v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 915)

Adverse Inferences and Section 34 CJPOA 1994: Comprehensive Analysis of Black v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 915)

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Adverse Inferences and Section 34 CJPOA 1994: Comprehensive Analysis of Black v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 915) Introduction Black v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 915) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the England...
Affirmation of Comprehensive Criminal Behaviour Orders and Supervisory Compliance in R v Tofagsazan [2020] EWCA Crim 982

Affirmation of Comprehensive Criminal Behaviour Orders and Supervisory Compliance in R v Tofagsazan [2020] EWCA Crim 982

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Affirmation of Comprehensive Criminal Behaviour Orders and Supervisory Compliance in R v Tofagsazan [2020] EWCA Crim 982 Introduction The case of Tofagsazan, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 982 was heard in...
Repudiatory Retention and Habitual Residence in Child Abduction Cases: Analysis of S (A Child) ([2020] EWCA Civ 923)

Repudiatory Retention and Habitual Residence in Child Abduction Cases: Analysis of S (A Child) ([2020] EWCA Civ 923)

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Repudiatory Retention and Habitual Residence in Child Abduction Cases: Analysis of S (A Child) ([2020] EWCA Civ 923) Introduction The case of S (A Child) ([2020] EWCA Civ 923) heard by the England...
Extraterritorial Application of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978: Roberts v. The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen And Families Association & Anor

Extraterritorial Application of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978: Roberts v. The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen And Families Association & Anor

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Extraterritorial Application of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978: Roberts v. The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen And Families Association & Anor 1. Introduction Roberts v. The Soldiers, Sailors,...
Jurisdictional Constraints on Cost Awards in Judicial Review and Upper Tribunal Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of JH v Upper Tribunal [2020] EWCA Civ 919

Jurisdictional Constraints on Cost Awards in Judicial Review and Upper Tribunal Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of JH v Upper Tribunal [2020] EWCA Civ 919

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Jurisdictional Constraints on Cost Awards in Judicial Review and Upper Tribunal Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of JH (Palestinian Territories) v. Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum...
Reinforcing Supervisory Requirements in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Insights from Tofagsazan v. EWCA Crim 982

Reinforcing Supervisory Requirements in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Insights from Tofagsazan v. EWCA Crim 982

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Reinforcing Supervisory Requirements in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Insights from Tofagsazan v. EWCA Crim 982 Introduction The case of Tofagsazan, R. v ([2020] EWCA Crim 982) represents a significant...
Ensuring Supervisory Compliance in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Tofagsazan R v EWCA Crim 982

Ensuring Supervisory Compliance in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Tofagsazan R v EWCA Crim 982

Date: Jul 18, 2020
Ensuring Supervisory Compliance in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Tofagsazan R v EWCA Crim 982 Introduction Tofagsazan R v EWCA Crim 982 is a significant judgment delivered on July 17, 2020, by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert