Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Expert Witness Standards and Conviction Safety: Byrne & Ors v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 107)

Reaffirming Expert Witness Standards and Conviction Safety: Byrne & Ors v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 107)

Date: Feb 4, 2021
Reaffirming Expert Witness Standards and Conviction Safety: Byrne & Ors v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 107) Introduction The case of Byrne & Ors v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 107) before the England and Wales...
Clarifying the 'Tilted Balance' under NPPF Paragraph 11d(ii): Insights from Gladman Developments Ltd v. Secretary of State (2021)

Clarifying the 'Tilted Balance' under NPPF Paragraph 11d(ii): Insights from Gladman Developments Ltd v. Secretary of State (2021)

Date: Feb 4, 2021
Clarifying the 'Tilted Balance' under NPPF Paragraph 11d(ii): Insights from Gladman Developments Ltd v. Secretary of State (2021) Introduction The case of Gladman Developments Ltd v. Secretary of...
Enhanced Jurisdiction for Disclosure from Personal Devices in Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phones 4U Ltd v. EE Ltd & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 116)

Enhanced Jurisdiction for Disclosure from Personal Devices in Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phones 4U Ltd v. EE Ltd & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 116)

Date: Feb 3, 2021
Enhanced Jurisdiction for Disclosure from Personal Devices in Litigation Introduction Phones 4U Ltd v. EE Ltd & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 116) is a landmark case adjudicated by the England and Wales Court...
Clarifying Rights of Occupation in Consent Orders: Derhalli v. Derhalli [2021] EWCA Civ 112

Clarifying Rights of Occupation in Consent Orders: Derhalli v. Derhalli [2021] EWCA Civ 112

Date: Feb 3, 2021
Clarifying Rights of Occupation in Consent Orders: Derhalli v. Derhalli [2021] EWCA Civ 112 Introduction Derhalli v. Derhalli ([2021] EWCA Civ 112) is a pivotal Court of Appeal decision that delves...
Balancing Seriousness and Rehabilitation in Youth Sentencing: R v VT [2021] EWCA Crim 166

Balancing Seriousness and Rehabilitation in Youth Sentencing: R v VT [2021] EWCA Crim 166

Date: Feb 3, 2021
Balancing Seriousness and Rehabilitation in Youth Sentencing: R v VT [2021] EWCA Crim 166 Introduction The case of R v VT ([2021] EWCA Crim 166) addresses the complex interplay between the severity...
Impact of Disclosure Failures in Sexual Offence Cases: Insights from Charnock v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 100)

Impact of Disclosure Failures in Sexual Offence Cases: Insights from Charnock v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 100)

Date: Feb 3, 2021
Impact of Disclosure Failures in Sexual Offence Cases: Insights from Charnock v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 100) Introduction The case of Charnock v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 100) adjudicated by the England...
Brown v [2021] EWCA Crim 269: Immediate Custodial Sentencing for Causing Death by Dangerous Driving

Brown v [2021] EWCA Crim 269: Immediate Custodial Sentencing for Causing Death by Dangerous Driving

Date: Feb 3, 2021
Brown v [2021] EWCA Crim 269: Immediate Custodial Sentencing for Causing Death by Dangerous Driving Introduction The case of Brown v [2021] EWCA Crim 269 presents a poignant legal examination of...
Capital Allowances Interpretation: Defining 'Tunnel' and 'Aqueduct' in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd ([2021] EWCA Civ 105)

Capital Allowances Interpretation: Defining 'Tunnel' and 'Aqueduct' in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd ([2021] EWCA Civ 105)

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Capital Allowances Interpretation: Defining 'Tunnel' and 'Aqueduct' in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd ([2021] EWCA Civ 105) Introduction HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd ([2021] EWCA Civ 105) is a pivotal case...
Capital Allowances Act 2001: Narrow Interpretation of 'Tunnel' and 'Aqueduct' in HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd

Capital Allowances Act 2001: Narrow Interpretation of 'Tunnel' and 'Aqueduct' in HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Capital Allowances Act 2001: Narrow Interpretation of 'Tunnel' and 'Aqueduct' in HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd Introduction HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd ([2021] EWCA Civ 105) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Abuse of Process in Malicious Falsehood: Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 18

Abuse of Process in Malicious Falsehood: Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 18

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Abuse of Process in Malicious Falsehood: Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 18 Introduction The case of Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 18) involves a complex legal battle centered...
Abuse of Process in Collateral Litigation: Insights from Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 18)

Abuse of Process in Collateral Litigation: Insights from Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 18)

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Abuse of Process in Collateral Litigation: Insights from Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 18) Introduction Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors is a landmark case adjudicated by the England and Wales...
Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors: Establishing Barriers Against Collateral Litigation in Malicious Falsehood Claims

Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors: Establishing Barriers Against Collateral Litigation in Malicious Falsehood Claims

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors: Establishing Barriers Against Collateral Litigation in Malicious Falsehood Claims Introduction In the landmark case Tinkler v. Ferguson & Ors ([2021] EWCA Civ 18), the...
Capital Allowances and the Interpretation of 'Structures' under the Capital Allowances Act 2001: Insights from HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 105

Capital Allowances and the Interpretation of 'Structures' under the Capital Allowances Act 2001: Insights from HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 105

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Capital Allowances and the Interpretation of 'Structures' under the Capital Allowances Act 2001: Insights from HMRC v. SSE Generation Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 105 1. Introduction HMRC v. SSE Generation...
Balancing Contempt Sanctions with External Misconduct: Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 102

Balancing Contempt Sanctions with External Misconduct: Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 102

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Balancing Contempt Sanctions with External Misconduct: Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 102 Introduction The case of Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd ([2021] EWCA Civ 102)...
Rebalancing Contempt Sanctions: The Role of Claimant Misconduct in Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd (2021)

Rebalancing Contempt Sanctions: The Role of Claimant Misconduct in Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd (2021)

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Rebalancing Contempt Sanctions: The Role of Claimant Misconduct in Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd (2021) Introduction Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd ([2021] EWCA Civ 102) is a pivotal...
Influence of Procedural Misconduct on Contempt of Court Sentencing: Comprehensive Commentary on Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 102

Influence of Procedural Misconduct on Contempt of Court Sentencing: Comprehensive Commentary on Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 102

Date: Feb 2, 2021
Influence of Procedural Misconduct on Contempt of Court Sentencing: Comprehensive Commentary on Lockett v. Minstrell Recruitment Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 102 1. Introduction Lockett v. Minstrell...
Strict Interpretation of 'Device or Substance' under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990: Insights from Thacker & Ors v R (2021)

Strict Interpretation of 'Device or Substance' under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990: Insights from Thacker & Ors v R (2021)

Date: Jan 30, 2021
Strict Interpretation of 'Device or Substance' under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990: Insights from Thacker & Ors v R (2021) Introduction The case of Thacker & Ors v R ([2021] EWCA Crim...
Restrictive Interpretation of 'Device or Substance' in Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990: Thacker & Ors v R [2021] EWCA Crim 97

Restrictive Interpretation of 'Device or Substance' in Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990: Thacker & Ors v R [2021] EWCA Crim 97

Date: Jan 30, 2021
Restrictive Interpretation of 'Device or Substance' in Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990: Thacker & Ors v R [2021] EWCA Crim 97 Introduction In the landmark case Thacker & Ors v R ([2021] EWCA...
Upper Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction to Impose Electronic Communications Code Rights Over Existing 1954 Act Tenancies

Upper Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction to Impose Electronic Communications Code Rights Over Existing 1954 Act Tenancies

Date: Jan 30, 2021
Upper Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction to Impose Electronic Communications Code Rights Over Existing 1954 Act Tenancies Introduction The case of Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v....
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure v. Ashloch Ltd & Anor: Clarifying Jurisdiction under the Electronic Communications Code

Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure v. Ashloch Ltd & Anor: Clarifying Jurisdiction under the Electronic Communications Code

Date: Jan 30, 2021
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure v. Ashloch Ltd & Anor: Clarifying Jurisdiction under the Electronic Communications Code Introduction In the landmark case of Cornerstone...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert